Quantum Computing Readiness Gap Widens as Organizations Struggle With Post-Quantum Cryptography Transition

Listen to this Post

Featured Image

Introduction

Quantum computing is rapidly shifting from theoretical possibility to an emerging technological force capable of reshaping cybersecurity foundations. While industries acknowledge the disruptive potential of quantum machines, a significant gap is forming between awareness and real-world preparedness. New research from Certes highlights a critical weakness in global cyber defense strategies: most organizations understand the threat of quantum computing but are not yet equipped to defend against it. As encryption systems built over decades face potential obsolescence, the urgency to transition toward post-quantum cryptography is becoming more pressing than many leaders realize.

Summary of the Original

Certes has released a new study revealing that a large majority of organizations are still not prepared for the cybersecurity risks associated with quantum computing. The Emerging PQC Imperative report shows that 78% of surveyed organizations believe legacy systems are their biggest vulnerability when facing quantum-driven threats. The research was conducted by Freeform Dynamics and commissioned by Certes, involving 200 senior IT and security leaders from the United States and the United Kingdom, including CISOs, CIOs, and decision-makers across sectors such as healthcare, manufacturing, financial services, and public administration. Despite widespread awareness of quantum risks, only 11% of organizations feel confident they can achieve post-quantum readiness within expected timelines, while just 2% are confident in achieving crypto agility at scale. An overwhelming 97% lack full confidence in meeting long-term crypto agility goals, showing a major gap between strategic awareness and operational execution. Certes CEO Paul German emphasized that understanding the risk is not the same as being prepared to handle it, warning that the transition window is narrowing faster than expected. The report also highlights edge computing and IoT systems as major weak points, with 74% of respondents identifying them as difficult-to-upgrade risk areas. Additionally, 73% of organizations are considering the implications of “harvest now, decrypt later” attacks, where encrypted data is collected today and decrypted in the future using quantum capabilities. Certes CTO Simon Pamplin noted that organizations making progress are treating quantum readiness as a broader business risk rather than a simple compliance requirement. Alongside the study, Certes announced version 7 of its Data Protection and Risk Mitigation platform, designed to support quantum-safe encryption and crypto-segmentation across hybrid cloud and legacy systems without major infrastructure disruption.

What Undercode Say:

Quantum computing is no longer a distant academic topic

It is now a strategic cybersecurity pressure point

Organizations are aware of the threat but structurally unprepared

The biggest issue is not knowledge but execution

Legacy infrastructure remains the central barrier to transformation

Many systems in use today were never designed for cryptographic agility
This creates a long-term technical debt that is difficult to reverse

Even organizations with strong security teams face integration challenges

Post-quantum cryptography requires system-wide architectural change

It is not a simple patch or software update

It demands coordinated upgrades across cloud, edge, and IoT layers
Edge and IoT devices represent persistent weak points in security chains
They are often resource-limited and difficult to update at scale
This makes them ideal long-term targets for future quantum-enabled attacks
The concept of “harvest now, decrypt later” changes threat modeling completely

Attackers can operate today with delayed exploitation strategies

This shifts cybersecurity from immediate defense to long-term foresight

Most organizations underestimate the timeline required for migration

Even 2030 may be too close given enterprise complexity

Crypto agility becomes a core requirement rather than a luxury feature

Few organizations currently have scalable cryptographic flexibility

The 11% readiness confidence level indicates a serious global gap
The 2% full confidence rate shows maturity is extremely limited
This is not just a technology issue but a governance challenge

Security teams must coordinate with business and infrastructure leaders

Quantum readiness must be integrated into digital transformation plans

Waiting increases both cost and operational disruption later

Certes’ platform update reflects a market push toward simplified migration

However, tools alone cannot solve structural dependency problems

Organizational inertia remains one of the biggest risks

The shift to quantum-safe systems will likely happen unevenly across industries
Financial and government sectors may move faster than manufacturing or healthcare

Regulatory pressure may become a major acceleration factor

Without urgency, organizations risk a reactive transition under crisis conditions
The next decade will define cybersecurity resilience in the quantum era

Fact Checker Results

✔️ The report’s claim that awareness of quantum risk is high aligns with industry trends
⚠️ Confidence percentages are based on a 200-person survey, which may limit global representation
✔️ “Harvest now, decrypt later” is a widely recognized cybersecurity threat model

Prediction

Quantum risk awareness will continue to rise sharply over the next 3 to 5 years as more governments and enterprises integrate post-quantum cryptography into compliance frameworks. However, actual deployment will lag behind awareness due to legacy infrastructure complexity. Early adopters in finance and defense will likely set the standard, while smaller organizations will rely heavily on managed security providers. The gap between readiness and threat capability is expected to widen before it narrows, creating a critical transition window around the late 2020s.

🕵️‍📝Let’s dive deep and fact‑check.

References:

Reported By: www.itsecurityguru.org
Extra Source Hub (Possible Sources for article):
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit
Wikipedia
OpenAi & Undercode AI

Image Source:

Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
Bing

🔐JOIN OUR CYBER WORLD [ CVE News • HackMonitor • UndercodeNews ]

💬 Whatsapp | 💬 Telegram

📢 Follow UndercodeNews & Stay Tuned:

𝕏 formerly Twitter 🐦 | @ Threads | 🔗 Linkedin | 🦋BlueSky | 🐘Mastodon | 📺Youtube