FortiBleed Exposes a Global Credential Harvesting Machine Targeting Hundreds of Thousands of Firewalls + Video

Listen to this Post

Featured Image

Introduction

Cybercrime has evolved far beyond isolated hacking attempts. Modern threat actors now operate with industrial efficiency, building automated ecosystems capable of harvesting millions of credentials across multiple technologies and regions simultaneously. A newly uncovered operation known as FortiBleed demonstrates just how sophisticated these campaigns have become.

Security researchers have revealed a massive credential-harvesting operation believed to be orchestrated by a financially motivated Russian-speaking Initial Access Broker (IAB). Since early 2026, the campaign has allegedly targeted more than 430,000 internet-facing FortiGate firewalls worldwide, collecting authentication data on an unprecedented scale. What makes FortiBleed particularly alarming is not just the volume of compromised systems, but the highly organized infrastructure behind it, including custom malware, credential-cracking pipelines, automated reconnaissance systems, geofencing controls, and large-scale access monetization.

The operation highlights a growing trend in cybercrime where attackers focus less on immediate ransomware deployment and more on harvesting credentials that can later be sold, reused, or leveraged to gain access into larger enterprise networks. Researchers believe the campaign may represent one of the most extensive credential-collection ecosystems observed in recent years.

FortiBleed Campaign Overview

FortiBleed is a large-scale credential theft operation designed to compromise Fortinet FortiGate devices and silently collect authentication information flowing through them. Unlike traditional malware that immediately disrupts operations, this campaign focuses on stealth, persistence, and long-term access generation.

Researchers assess that the threat actor behind FortiBleed operates primarily for financial gain. The harvested credentials can be sold on underground markets, used to compromise corporate environments, or leveraged to expand access deeper into victim infrastructures.

The campaign has reportedly remained active since February 2026 and has expanded far beyond Fortinet products, demonstrating characteristics of a mature access-broker operation.

The Rise of Initial Access Brokers

Initial Access Brokers have become a critical component of the cybercrime ecosystem. Rather than conducting ransomware attacks themselves, these groups specialize in obtaining network access and selling it to other criminal organizations.

FortiBleed appears to fit this model perfectly.

Instead of immediately exploiting victims after compromise, attackers focus on gathering usernames, passwords, hashes, authentication tokens, and session cookies. These assets become valuable commodities that can later be purchased by ransomware gangs, espionage actors, or financially motivated cybercriminals.

The business model is simple yet extremely profitable: compromise thousands of systems, harvest credentials, and monetize access repeatedly.

Custom Tooling Behind the Operation

At the center of the campaign sits a custom Golang-based utility known as FortigateSniffer.

The tool reportedly abuses native diagnostic functionality already present within FortiOS. By leveraging built-in packet capture capabilities, attackers can silently observe network traffic passing through compromised devices without deploying noisy malware that might trigger traditional security alerts.

FortigateSniffer was engineered to monitor authentication traffic across numerous protocols, automatically parsing captured communications and extracting credential information.

Because the activity relies on legitimate system functionality, detection becomes significantly more difficult.

Capturing Credentials at Scale

Once deployed, FortigateSniffer begins monitoring a broad range of enterprise authentication protocols.

These reportedly include:

Kerberos Authentication

Kerberos traffic can reveal valuable authentication data used extensively in Windows Active Directory environments.

LDAP Communications

LDAP traffic provides insight into directory services and enterprise user authentication workflows.

SMB Sessions

SMB traffic can expose credentials used for file sharing and network resource access.

RADIUS Authentication

Organizations frequently use RADIUS for VPN and network authentication, making it a valuable target.

Database Authentication

MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Microsoft SQL Server authentication flows are also monitored, potentially exposing sensitive administrative accounts.

Remote Access Services

Protocols such as RDP, WinRM, FTP, Telnet, SMTP, and TACACS+ reportedly fall within the collection scope.

The ability to monitor twenty-four different authentication protocols significantly expands the attacker’s credential collection capabilities.

More Than Just Fortinet Devices

One of the most significant discoveries is that FortiBleed appears to be part of a much larger multi-vendor operation.

Researchers found evidence suggesting automated attacks against:

Fortinet FortiGate Firewalls

Synology NAS Devices

Sophos Firewalls

RDWeb Portals

Citrix SSL-VPN Systems

Microsoft SQL Servers

This broader targeting strategy indicates that the operation is not focused on exploiting a single vendor weakness. Instead, it seeks any internet-facing infrastructure capable of providing access to enterprise environments.

Such diversification increases profitability while reducing reliance on any individual technology platform.

Massive Credential Harvesting Numbers

The scale of credential collection attributed to FortiBleed is staggering.

Researchers estimate that hundreds of credential-harvesting pipelines were active during late May and mid-June 2026.

The operation reportedly identified over 110 million credentials and authentication artifacts.

Among the collected data were:

14.8 million RADIUS credentials

924,000 NTLM hashes

130,000 Kerberos hashes

89 million MySQL authentication tokens

These figures illustrate the industrial nature of the campaign.

Rather than targeting a handful of organizations, attackers appear to be harvesting credentials at internet scale.

Five Stages of the FortiBleed Attack Chain

Stage One: Global Reconnaissance

The campaign begins with extensive internet scanning.

Attackers reportedly leverage tools such as Masscan and Shodan to identify exposed FortiGate appliances worldwide.

Custom filtering utilities then organize discovered targets by country and region.

Stage Two: Credential Attacks

After identifying targets, attackers launch credential stuffing and brute-force attacks.

Custom software focuses specifically on FortiGate administrative interfaces and SSL-VPN portals.

Successful compromises grant administrative-level access.

Stage Three: Traffic Interception

Once access is established, FortigateSniffer is deployed.

The tool passively captures authentication traffic flowing through the compromised firewall infrastructure.

Credentials, hashes, and authentication artifacts are silently collected.

Stage Four: Hash Cracking Operations

Captured password hashes are transferred into cracking environments.

Researchers observed the use of dedicated cracking frameworks alongside Telegram-based automation systems that coordinate the process.

Successfully cracked credentials are then validated and categorized.

Stage Five: Lateral Movement and Data Theft

Validated credentials are reused against enterprise services.

Attackers move laterally through victim networks, enumerate Active Directory environments, and exfiltrate sensitive data.

Session cookies are reportedly leveraged to maintain persistent authenticated access even after passwords change.

Geofencing and Operational Discipline

Unlike many opportunistic cybercrime campaigns, FortiBleed demonstrates remarkable operational discipline.

Researchers identified geofencing functionality that limits activity to specific geographic regions.

The infrastructure also appears to operate primarily during business hours aligned with Moscow time.

This behavior suggests a structured team environment rather than individual attackers working randomly.

The campaign reportedly runs in five-hour operational cycles with continuous monitoring and validation processes.

Such automation reflects a mature cybercriminal operation capable of managing massive numbers of targets simultaneously.

Suspicious Backdoor Accounts Discovered

Investigators identified another unusual characteristic during analysis.

Certain username and password combinations appeared repeatedly across thousands of unique IP addresses.

This repetition raises concerns that attackers may have intentionally planted backdoor accounts across compromised systems.

If confirmed, these credentials could provide future access even after organizations believe remediation efforts are complete.

Such persistence techniques significantly increase the long-term risk associated with compromise.

Underground Markets and Monetization

The investigation coincides with reports that a Russian-speaking underground actor known as “SantaAd” advertised access to thousands of Fortinet devices.

Initial pricing reportedly began around $30,000 before rapidly increasing to $60,000.

Although no direct connection has been confirmed between SantaAd and FortiBleed, the timing highlights the thriving market for network access.

Compromised enterprise infrastructure remains one of the most valuable commodities within cybercriminal ecosystems.

Access brokers continue to profit from selling entry points rather than conducting attacks themselves.

Why Small and Medium Businesses Are Prime Targets

Researchers observed a strong emphasis on organizations employing fewer than 200 people.

Small and medium-sized businesses often lack dedicated security teams, continuous monitoring capabilities, and mature incident response programs.

Many also serve larger enterprises as vendors, contractors, or managed service providers.

Compromising a smaller company can therefore provide attackers with pathways into larger organizations.

This supply-chain access model dramatically increases the value of SMB-focused campaigns.

Deep Analysis: Understanding the Technical Workflow Through Security Operations

The FortiBleed operation showcases how modern cybercrime increasingly mirrors legitimate enterprise automation.

Security teams can study similar workflows using defensive tools and commands:

Identify listening services

nmap -sV target-ip

Review firewall logs

grep "failed" /var/log/auth.log

Monitor network traffic

tcpdump -i eth0

Inspect authentication attempts

journalctl -u ssh

Detect unusual outbound connections

netstat -antp

Review active sessions

who

Identify privilege escalation attempts

sudo ausearch -m USER_CMD

Monitor network statistics

iftop

Detect brute-force activity

fail2ban-client status

Check SSH login history

last

Analyze firewall events

iptables -L -v

Review process activity

ps aux

Search for suspicious binaries

find / -type f -perm -4000

Audit user accounts

cat /etc/passwd

Review cron persistence

crontab -l

Monitor live logs

tail -f /var/log/syslog

The technical sophistication observed in FortiBleed highlights a major shift in attacker strategy. Rather than exploiting a single vulnerability, operators build complete ecosystems that combine reconnaissance, credential harvesting, password cracking, validation, persistence, and monetization.

The use of native operating system functionality instead of traditional malware demonstrates a growing preference for “living off the land” techniques. Security products often focus on detecting malicious binaries, yet attackers increasingly rely on legitimate administrative features.

Another noteworthy aspect is the

The geofencing functionality indicates intentional target selection rather than indiscriminate scanning. This level of control suggests operational maturity and potentially significant financial resources.

The focus on service providers is particularly concerning. Managed service providers, IT consultants, and hosting companies frequently maintain privileged access to numerous client environments. A single compromise can create cascading effects across entire customer ecosystems.

FortiBleed also highlights the growing importance of credential security. Organizations often prioritize patch management while overlooking password hygiene, MFA deployment, and authentication monitoring.

The collection of authentication tokens, hashes, and session cookies further illustrates how passwords are no longer the sole target. Modern attackers pursue every available authentication artifact.

The reported use of Telegram automation reveals how cybercriminal operations increasingly integrate consumer platforms into their workflows. Communication, coordination, and automation are becoming deeply interconnected.

The scale of over 110 million collected credentials demonstrates that identity has become the primary battleground in cybersecurity. Access itself is now the product being sold.

Organizations defending against similar campaigns must prioritize multi-factor authentication, credential rotation, privileged access management, network segmentation, and continuous monitoring.

Future campaigns will likely become even more automated as artificial intelligence and offensive security tooling continue to mature.

What Undercode Say:

FortiBleed represents a clear evolution in cybercriminal economics.

Instead of launching noisy ransomware attacks immediately, attackers are investing in long-term credential harvesting operations.

The strategy is logical from a financial perspective.

Access can be sold repeatedly.

Credentials can be reused repeatedly.

Compromised organizations may remain vulnerable for months.

The campaign demonstrates how identity has become more valuable than malware.

Attackers no longer need zero-day vulnerabilities when weak credentials remain abundant.

FortiBleed’s automation level is particularly notable.

The use of reconnaissance pipelines, credential validation systems, and automated cracking infrastructure resembles a cloud-based software operation.

This is cybercrime operating at enterprise scale.

The targeting of service providers reflects strategic thinking.

One compromised provider can open access to dozens or hundreds of downstream customers.

This dramatically improves attacker return on investment.

The use of legitimate diagnostic functions creates a major detection challenge.

Traditional antivirus solutions are unlikely to identify activities that leverage built-in operating system capabilities.

Organizations must therefore shift toward behavioral monitoring.

Network visibility becomes critical.

Authentication telemetry becomes critical.

Identity protection becomes critical.

Another interesting observation is the reported geofencing behavior.

Attackers appear conscious of operational security.

Limiting activity to selected regions reduces noise and helps avoid unnecessary attention.

The appearance of repeated credentials across thousands of IP addresses raises serious concerns.

If those accounts were deliberately planted, organizations may face hidden persistence mechanisms even after remediation.

The operation also demonstrates why password-only security models are increasingly obsolete.

Multi-factor authentication remains one of the most effective defenses against credential reuse.

The broader multi-vendor targeting strategy indicates flexibility.

Attackers are not dependent on Fortinet.

They are pursuing access wherever it can be found.

This suggests future campaigns could easily pivot toward additional appliance vendors.

The cybercrime economy increasingly rewards access brokers.

As long as underground demand for network access remains high, campaigns like FortiBleed will continue to grow.

Security leaders should view this operation as a warning.

The next major breach may begin not with malware but with a quietly harvested password.

✅ Multiple security researchers reportedly observed a large credential-harvesting operation targeting FortiGate devices and related infrastructure.

✅ The

✅ The reported credential volumes and operational details originate from threat intelligence investigations, though some attribution and infrastructure connections remain assessments rather than publicly verified facts.

❌ No publicly confirmed evidence currently proves a direct connection between the FortiBleed operation and the underground actor known as “SantaAd.”

❌ Claims regarding intentionally planted backdoor credentials remain investigative findings and should not yet be considered conclusively proven.

❌ Attribution to a specific Russian-speaking group is based on threat intelligence analysis and observed behaviors rather than official law-enforcement confirmation.

Prediction

(+1) Organizations will accelerate deployment of multi-factor authentication across VPNs, firewalls, and administrative portals after exposure of large-scale credential harvesting operations.

(+1) Security vendors will introduce stronger monitoring capabilities for authentication traffic abuse and misuse of built-in diagnostic functions.

(+1) Identity-centric security platforms will receive increased investment as enterprises recognize credentials as the primary attack target.

(-1) Access broker operations will continue expanding because harvested credentials remain highly profitable on underground markets.

(-1) Small and medium businesses will remain disproportionately affected due to limited security resources and weaker authentication controls.

(-1) Future campaigns will likely incorporate more AI-driven automation, allowing attackers to process larger target populations with greater efficiency.

▶️ Related Video (82% Match):

🕵️‍📝Let’s dive deep and fact‑check.

🎓 Live Courses & Certifications:

Join Undercode Academy for Verified Certifications

🚀 Request a Custom Project:

Secure, high-velocity infrastructure and disruptive technological engineering. Contact our engineering team for high-tier development and proprietary systems:
[email protected]
💎 Smart Architecture | 🛡️ Secure by Design | ⭐ Trusted by Thousands

References:

Reported By: thehackernews.com
Extra Source Hub (Possible Sources for article):
https://www.instagram.com
Wikipedia
OpenAi & Undercode AI

Image Source:

Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2

🔐JOIN OUR CYBER WORLD [ CVE News • HackMonitor • UndercodeNews ]

💬 Whatsapp | 💬 Telegram

📢 Follow UndercodeNews & Stay Tuned:

𝕏 formerly Twitter 🐦 | @ Threads | 🔗 Linkedin | 🦋BlueSky | 🐘Mastodon | 📺Youtube