Listen to this Post
A New Day, Two New Ransomware Claims
The ransomware landscape rarely gives defenders a quiet day, and August 8, 2026, is already producing another reminder of how quickly threat activity can expand. Two separate organizations — Clausing and MEDICOS — have reportedly been added to ransomware victim lists associated with Qilin and Bravox, respectively.
According to threat intelligence activity shared by ThreatMon, the Qilin ransomware operation listed Clausing as a new victim on August 8. Separately, the Bravox ransomware group reportedly added MEDICOS to its victim list several hours earlier.
These reports are important, but they also require careful interpretation. A ransomware group’s victim-list post is an allegation by the threat actor, not independent proof that an organization was successfully compromised or that data was actually stolen. Until the affected organizations, investigators, law enforcement agencies, or independent forensic researchers confirm the incidents, the claims should be treated as unverified.
Still, the appearance of multiple organizations in ransomware monitoring feeds on the same day illustrates a broader reality: modern ransomware operations continue to operate as persistent businesses, constantly searching for vulnerable networks, valuable information, and organizations willing to pay under pressure.
Qilin Claims Clausing as a New Victim
Threat intelligence monitoring reported that the Qilin ransomware group had added Clausing to its victim list.
The reported timestamp associated with the activity is August 8, 2026, at 15:30:30 UTC+3.
At this stage, the available information does not establish exactly how Qilin allegedly gained access to Clausing’s environment, what systems may have been affected, whether information was encrypted, or whether sensitive data was exfiltrated.
Those details matter because ransomware incidents are no longer limited to the traditional model of encrypting files and demanding payment for a decryption key.
Modern ransomware groups frequently combine multiple pressure techniques, including network intrusion, data theft, encryption, public leak threats, and direct communication with victims.
Why the Qilin Claim Deserves Attention
Qilin has become one of the ransomware names frequently associated with the broader ransomware-as-a-service ecosystem.
The
This means that an individual ransomware listing can represent the final visible stage of a much larger intrusion chain.
If the Clausing claim is eventually confirmed, investigators will need to determine whether the attack originated through stolen credentials, an exposed remote service, an unpatched vulnerability, social engineering, an affiliate intrusion, or another access mechanism.
Bravox Reports MEDICOS as Another Victim
A separate threat intelligence alert reported that the Bravox ransomware group had added MEDICOS to its victim list.
The reported timestamp was August 8, 2026, at 01:52:10 UTC+3.
As with the Clausing report, the information currently available does not independently establish the extent of the alleged compromise.
There is no reliable evidence in the supplied report confirming how many systems were affected, how much information may have been stolen, whether operations were disrupted, or whether a ransom demand was issued.
That distinction is critical.
A ransomware
Two Names, One Larger Pattern
The appearance of Clausing and MEDICOS in separate ransomware reports is more significant when viewed as part of the wider threat environment.
Ransomware groups continually compete for attention in underground communities. Victim listings can serve several purposes: pressuring organizations, demonstrating credibility to affiliates, advertising the group’s capabilities, and attempting to create urgency around ransom negotiations.
For defenders, however, these announcements can also become valuable early-warning signals.
Even when a claim has not been independently verified, a credible-looking ransomware listing can justify checking authentication logs, endpoint telemetry, VPN activity, privileged-account behavior, unusual data transfers, and recently exploited vulnerabilities.
Ransomware Claims Are Not Automatically Confirmed Breaches
One of the most important lessons from incidents like these is the difference between a ransomware claim and a confirmed cybersecurity incident.
Threat actors have historically exaggerated, recycled, or fabricated claims for strategic reasons.
A victim may appear on a leak site even when the attacker had limited access. In other cases, an organization may have experienced a compromise but prevented encryption before significant operational damage occurred.
There are also situations in which attackers steal data without encrypting systems at all.
Consequently, the strongest assessment requires evidence from multiple sources rather than relying exclusively on an attacker’s announcement.
The Double-Extortion Problem
The modern ransomware economy is heavily influenced by double extortion.
Instead of relying exclusively on encryption, attackers can steal sensitive files before disrupting systems. They can then threaten to publish the information if the victim refuses to pay.
This strategy changes the economics of ransomware.
A company with reliable backups may be able to restore its systems without paying for decryption. But if attackers possess sensitive contracts, employee records, financial documents, customer information, intellectual property, or internal communications, backups cannot eliminate the data-leak threat.
That is why ransomware defense increasingly requires both business continuity planning and data-loss prevention.
Why Victim Lists Still Matter
Even unverified victim-list activity can provide defenders with useful intelligence.
A newly listed organization can immediately begin looking for indicators of compromise without waiting for a formal public announcement.
Security teams can compare the timing of the claim against authentication anomalies, suspicious administrative activity, endpoint detections, unusual archive creation, large outbound transfers, and unexpected changes to security controls.
In this sense, ransomware leak sites and threat intelligence feeds can become an imperfect but useful early-warning mechanism.
The challenge is separating genuine intelligence from manipulation.
Clausing and MEDICOS Need Independent Verification
At the time represented by the supplied report, there is not enough information to state as fact that Clausing and MEDICOS suffered confirmed ransomware attacks.
The appropriate wording is therefore that Qilin reportedly claimed Clausing as a victim, while Bravox reportedly claimed MEDICOS as a victim.
This distinction is not merely semantic.
In cybersecurity reporting, incorrectly presenting an unverified threat-actor claim as a confirmed breach can create unnecessary reputational damage, spread misinformation, and make subsequent reporting less reliable.
Responsible threat intelligence should preserve uncertainty until evidence becomes available.
Deep Analysis: What the Two Ransomware Claims Reveal
1. The Ransomware Economy Remains Active
The latest reports demonstrate that ransomware activity continues to generate a steady stream of victim claims.
Even when individual incidents require verification, the volume of activity illustrates that ransomware remains an established component of the cybercrime economy.
- Qilin Remains a Name Defenders Should Monitor
The appearance of Qilin in a new victim report is significant because the operation has maintained visibility within the ransomware ecosystem.
Organizations should therefore treat Qilin-related intelligence as a potential indicator for proactive monitoring.
- Bravox Adds Another Layer to the Threat Landscape
The separate Bravox claim involving MEDICOS demonstrates that ransomware activity is not concentrated around a single dominant operation.
Multiple groups can operate simultaneously across different targets and geographic regions.
4. Victim Listings Can Be Strategic Weapons
Publishing a
Attackers can use public exposure to force executives, legal teams, insurers, and incident responders into accelerated negotiations.
The leak-site announcement therefore becomes part of the attack rather than merely a report about the attack.
5. Public Pressure Can Arrive Before Confirmation
An organization may learn that an attacker has publicly named it before it has completed its internal investigation.
That creates a difficult communications problem.
Security teams must investigate rapidly while executives and communications departments determine what can responsibly be disclosed.
6. The First Question Should Be Access
When a ransomware claim appears, investigators should begin by asking how the attacker could have entered.
Potential paths include stolen credentials, compromised remote-access infrastructure, exposed applications, vulnerable edge devices, phishing, malicious downloads, and third-party compromise.
Identifying the initial-access vector is often more valuable than focusing only on the encryption stage.
7. Credential Theft Remains a Major Risk
Ransomware does not always require a sophisticated zero-day exploit.
Valid credentials can provide attackers with an extremely efficient path into enterprise environments.
For that reason, identity protection should be treated as a core ransomware-control mechanism.
- Multifactor Authentication Is Necessary but Not Sufficient
Strong MFA can significantly reduce the value of stolen passwords.
However, organizations must also protect session tokens, privileged accounts, recovery mechanisms, identity providers, and administrative interfaces.
Attackers increasingly look for weaknesses surrounding authentication rather than simply trying to guess passwords.
9. Privileged Accounts Are High-Value Targets
Once attackers gain an initial foothold, privilege escalation becomes a critical objective.
Administrative accounts can provide access to security systems, backups, servers, databases, and endpoint-management infrastructure.
Reducing unnecessary administrative privileges therefore limits the blast radius of an intrusion.
10. Backups Are Still Essential
Reliable offline or otherwise isolated backups remain one of the strongest defenses against destructive ransomware.
But backups must be protected against attackers who deliberately attempt to delete or encrypt them.
A backup that is reachable from the production environment may eventually become another ransomware target.
11. Recovery Must Be Tested
Having backups is not the same as being able to recover.
Organizations should regularly test restoration procedures and determine how quickly critical systems can be rebuilt.
A recovery plan that exists only in documentation may fail when an actual ransomware incident begins.
12. Data Theft Changes the Equation
Encryption can often be reversed through restoration.
Stolen information cannot be restored to secrecy.
That is why organizations must identify sensitive data and monitor unusual outbound transfers before an attacker has an opportunity to remove large quantities of information.
13. Network Segmentation Can Limit Damage
A compromised workstation should not automatically provide a pathway into every critical server.
Network segmentation can restrict lateral movement and make it harder for attackers to turn one compromised endpoint into an enterprise-wide disaster.
14. Endpoint Detection Is Critical
Modern ransomware operations often generate suspicious behavior before encryption begins.
Security teams can look for abnormal PowerShell activity, credential dumping, remote administration, unusual process execution, privilege escalation, and large-scale file operations.
Early detection can provide the difference between a contained intrusion and a major incident.
- EDR Telemetry Can Reveal the Attack Chain
Endpoint telemetry can help investigators reconstruct what happened.
Rather than investigating individual alerts in isolation, analysts should build a timeline connecting authentication events, process execution, network activity, privilege changes, and file access.
This approach can expose the
16. Threat Intelligence Can Accelerate Investigation
Threat intelligence feeds can provide information about ransomware groups, infrastructure, indicators, tactics, and emerging campaigns.
However, intelligence must be validated before being treated as definitive evidence.
A feed should support investigation rather than replace it.
17. Dark-Web Monitoring Has a Defensive Role
Monitoring criminal forums and ransomware leak sites can sometimes provide early warnings.
Security teams may discover an alleged victim listing before the organization publicly acknowledges an incident.
The information should then trigger verification rather than immediate publication as fact.
18. Threat Actors Depend on Reputation
Ransomware groups need credibility.
Affiliates are more likely to work with an operation that appears capable of delivering results and maintaining infrastructure.
Victim announcements can therefore function as marketing material for the criminal ecosystem.
19. Publicity Can Increase Criminal Pressure
The public announcement of a victim can create psychological pressure.
Organizations may feel compelled to respond before investigators understand the full scope of the incident.
This is exactly why incident-response teams need predefined communication procedures.
20. Executives Need Accurate Information Quickly
Senior leadership does not necessarily need every technical detail during the first hours of an incident.
They need accurate answers to a smaller set of questions: What happened? What systems are affected? Is the attacker still inside? Was data stolen? Can operations continue? What decisions must be made now?
A structured incident command process helps prevent confusion.
21. Legal Teams Must Work Alongside Security
Potential data theft can create regulatory and contractual obligations.
Security teams should therefore work closely with legal and privacy specialists when evidence suggests that personal or confidential information may have been accessed.
The exact obligations depend on the affected organization, jurisdiction, and type of information involved.
22. Insurance Can Influence Incident Response
Cyber insurance policies often contain strict requirements concerning notification, approved responders, ransom negotiations, and forensic investigation.
Organizations should understand these requirements before an incident occurs.
Waiting until a ransomware event begins to discover policy restrictions can complicate an already chaotic situation.
- Third Parties Can Expand the Attack Surface
Organizations rarely operate in isolation.
Cloud providers, managed service providers, software vendors, contractors, and other partners may have privileged connectivity.
A ransomware investigation must therefore consider whether access originated from a trusted third party.
24. Remote Access Deserves Special Attention
VPNs, remote desktop services, administrative portals, and other remote-access technologies remain attractive targets.
Organizations should continuously review which services are exposed to the internet and whether they require external access at all.
Every unnecessary public-facing service increases potential attack surface.
25. Patch Management Remains Fundamental
Not every ransomware incident requires an advanced exploit.
Known vulnerabilities can remain dangerous for months or years when organizations fail to patch internet-facing systems.
Attackers routinely prioritize weaknesses that provide reliable access at scale.
26. Attackers Look for the Weakest Link
Cybersecurity is often described in terms of the strongest controls.
Attackers, however, are usually interested in the weakest available path.
One poorly protected account, forgotten server, exposed appliance, or outdated application can undermine otherwise sophisticated defenses.
27. Human Behavior Still Matters
Employees remain part of the security boundary.
Phishing, social engineering, malicious attachments, fake updates, and fraudulent login pages can all provide attackers with initial access.
Technical controls should therefore be reinforced by practical security awareness.
28. Ransomware Is Increasingly About Data
The ransomware business has evolved from simply locking computers to monetizing information.
Data can be sold, leaked, used for extortion, or leveraged for additional fraud.
This makes information governance increasingly important.
29. Sensitive Data Should Be Minimized
The less sensitive information an organization stores unnecessarily, the less attractive it becomes as a target.
Data retention policies can reduce the amount of information available to attackers during a compromise.
Security is partly about protecting what exists — and partly about not retaining unnecessary risk.
30. Detection Speed Can Change the Outcome
An attacker who remains undetected for days or weeks has more opportunities to map the network, steal credentials, locate backups, and collect data.
Rapid detection can dramatically restrict those opportunities.
The objective should therefore be to identify suspicious behavior before encryption begins.
31. Incident Response Should Assume Lateral Movement
Once ransomware activity is detected, organizations should avoid assuming that the visible infected machine is the only compromised asset.
Investigators should examine adjacent systems, privileged accounts, authentication infrastructure, and remote-access services.
Containment must address the attacker rather than only the malware.
32. Ransomware Groups Adapt Quickly
Security controls that worked against one campaign may not work against another.
Threat actors change infrastructure, tools, affiliates, and access methods.
Continuous monitoring is therefore more effective than relying on a one-time security assessment.
33. Leak-Site Claims Should Trigger Investigation
The correct response to an alleged victim listing is neither panic nor dismissal.
The listing should be treated as a signal that warrants investigation.
Security teams can then determine whether the claim has supporting evidence.
34. Verification Protects the Public
Threat intelligence reporting has enormous value, but inaccurate attribution can cause serious problems.
Distinguishing between “claimed,” “reported,” and “confirmed” protects both the public and affected organizations.
It also improves the quality of future cybersecurity research.
- The Timing of the Two Claims Is Noteworthy
Qilin’s Clausing claim and Bravox’s MEDICOS claim were reported on the same date but at different times.
That does not prove the incidents are connected.
There is currently no evidence in the supplied material showing that the two organizations were targeted through the same campaign or infrastructure.
- Separate Actors Can Create a Larger Threat Picture
Even unrelated ransomware incidents matter collectively.
When multiple groups remain operational, defenders must monitor a wide range of tactics rather than concentrating exclusively on one ransomware family.
The threat environment is distributed and constantly changing.
- Organizations Should Monitor Before They Are Named
The best time to detect ransomware activity is before a victim appears on a leak site.
Continuous monitoring, identity analytics, endpoint detection, vulnerability management, and network visibility can expose suspicious activity much earlier.
Public victim lists should be considered a last-resort warning signal, not the primary detection mechanism.
38. Security Teams Need Threat-Informed Defense
Organizations should use intelligence about active ransomware groups to prioritize defensive controls.
If attackers are known to target exposed remote services, those services should receive additional monitoring.
If credential theft is common, identity telemetry should receive greater attention.
Threat intelligence becomes useful when it changes defensive decisions.
39. Ransomware Resilience Is a Business Strategy
Ransomware is not exclusively an IT problem.
It can affect manufacturing, healthcare, finance, logistics, communications, customer service, legal operations, and executive decision-making.
Building resilience therefore requires cooperation across the entire organization.
40. The Biggest Lesson Is Preparation
Whether the Clausing and MEDICOS claims ultimately prove accurate or not, the underlying lesson remains the same.
Organizations that prepare for ransomware before an incident have far more options once an attacker appears.
Those that wait until systems are encrypted and sensitive data is already outside the network are forced to make decisions under extreme pressure.
What Undercode Say:
Ransomware Has Become a Continuous Business
The latest Qilin and Bravox claims show why ransomware should no longer be viewed as an occasional cybersecurity emergency. It is a persistent criminal business model operating every day.
A Victim Listing Is an Alarm Bell
Even when a claim remains unverified, defenders should not ignore it. A credible listing can become the first public indication that an organization may have been targeted.
Verification Must Come First
The strongest cybersecurity reporting distinguishes between an allegation and a confirmed breach. At this point, the supplied intelligence supports reporting these incidents as ransomware claims rather than established compromises.
Qilin Remains a Serious Threat
Qilin’s appearance in the latest intelligence demonstrates the continuing relevance of the operation to defenders monitoring ransomware activity.
Bravox Deserves Monitoring Too
The Bravox claim involving MEDICOS highlights how defenders cannot focus exclusively on the largest ransomware brands. Smaller or less familiar groups can still create substantial disruption.
Ransomware Groups Sell Fear
A ransomware leak-site announcement is designed to create pressure. The attack is technical, but the final weapon is often psychological.
Publicity Can Become Part of the Attack
Once an organization is publicly named, executives may face pressure from customers, partners, employees, regulators, and journalists before the investigation is complete.
Data Theft Is the Real Long-Term Risk
Encryption can potentially be defeated through recovery. Sensitive information that has already been stolen cannot simply be restored.
Backups Are Not a Complete Solution
Backups remain critical, but they do not eliminate the consequences of data theft. Modern ransomware resilience therefore requires both recovery and data protection.
Identity Security Needs Greater Attention
Stolen credentials can allow attackers to move quietly through environments without immediately triggering traditional malware defenses.
MFA Should Be Everywhere Possible
Strong multifactor authentication can reduce the effectiveness of stolen passwords, particularly for externally accessible systems and privileged accounts.
Privileged Access Should Be Restricted
Attackers seek administrative privileges because they dramatically increase the potential impact of an intrusion. Organizations should minimize unnecessary privilege.
Segmentation Can Contain an Intrusion
Network segmentation can prevent attackers from moving freely between user systems, servers, backups, and critical infrastructure.
Detection Must Happen Early
The difference between a contained compromise and a major ransomware event may be measured in hours.
EDR Is a Critical Layer
Endpoint detection can expose suspicious behavior before attackers begin large-scale encryption or data destruction.
Outbound Traffic Matters
Organizations should monitor unusual transfers, especially when large quantities of files are suddenly compressed or moved toward unfamiliar external infrastructure.
Dark-Web Intelligence Has Defensive Value
Criminal forums and ransomware leak sites are not reliable sources of truth by themselves, but they can provide valuable early-warning information.
Intelligence Requires Context
A threat report becomes useful when analysts combine it with internal logs, endpoint telemetry, authentication records, and network evidence.
Ransomware Claims Can Be Manipulative
Threat actors have incentives to exaggerate their success. Every claim should therefore be validated.
Responsible Reporting Protects Victims
Calling an alleged incident a confirmed breach without evidence can cause additional harm to the organization involved.
Timing Alone Does Not Establish a Connection
The Clausing and MEDICOS claims occurred on the same day, but nothing in the supplied information proves that the attacks are related.
Different Groups Mean Different Risks
Organizations need a defense strategy capable of handling multiple ransomware families and changing affiliate tactics.
Attack Surface Reduction Remains Powerful
Reducing unnecessary internet-facing services can eliminate entire categories of potential initial-access opportunities.
Patch Management Still Matters
Known vulnerabilities remain dangerous when organizations delay remediation, particularly on systems exposed directly to the internet.
Remote Access Requires Constant Review
VPNs, remote administration platforms, and exposed management interfaces should be treated as high-value assets.
Third Parties Cannot Be Ignored
Managed service providers and vendors can introduce additional pathways into otherwise well-defended networks.
Human Risk Remains Important
Phishing and social engineering continue to provide attackers with practical routes around sophisticated technical controls.
Data Governance Is Cybersecurity
Organizations should know where sensitive information is stored, who can access it, and how long it needs to be retained.
Incident Response Must Be Practiced
A response plan that has never been tested may collapse under real-world pressure.
Executives Need Clear Information
During an incident, leadership needs concise facts about operational impact, data exposure, containment, recovery, and immediate decisions.
Legal and Security Teams Must Coordinate
Potential data exposure can create obligations that require rapid coordination between technical investigators, legal teams, privacy specialists, and executives.
Recovery Speed Matters
The longer critical operations remain unavailable, the greater the financial and operational damage can become.
Ransomware Resilience Is Measurable
Organizations should know how quickly they can detect, isolate, restore, and communicate during a ransomware incident.
Attackers Exploit Weaknesses, Not Reputations
A company does not need to be a global giant to become a target. Criminal groups often select organizations based on opportunity and perceived leverage.
Security Cannot Depend on Obscurity
Assuming that attackers will not find a particular organization is not a defense strategy.
Continuous Monitoring Beats Periodic Checking
Threats evolve too quickly for organizations to rely solely on annual assessments or occasional vulnerability scans.
The Most Dangerous Attack May Be the One Nobody Sees
Ransomware encryption is highly visible, but credential theft and silent data exfiltration can remain hidden for much longer.
The Next Victim May Already Be Compromised
One of the most concerning possibilities is that organizations currently showing no public warning may already have attackers inside their environments.
Preparation Is the Strongest Advantage
The organizations best positioned to withstand ransomware are not necessarily those with the largest security budgets. They are the ones that understand their assets, monitor their environments, protect identities, isolate backups, and rehearse their response.
The Qilin and Bravox Claims Are a Warning
Whether every detail of these claims is eventually confirmed or not, the reports reinforce the same message: ransomware remains active, adaptive, and capable of turning a technical intrusion into a business crisis.
✅ The Qilin Claim Was Reported
Threat intelligence monitoring attributed a new victim listing involving Clausing to the Qilin ransomware group, with the supplied report giving an August 8, 2026 timestamp.
✅ The Bravox Claim Was Reported
The supplied intelligence also reports that MEDICOS was added to a Bravox ransomware victim list on August 8, 2026.
❌ The Breaches Are Not Independently Confirmed
The supplied information does not independently prove that either organization suffered a successful ransomware compromise, what data was allegedly stolen, or how extensive any intrusion may have been. The claims should therefore remain classified as unverified ransomware allegations until corroborating evidence emerges.
Prediction
(+1) Ransomware Monitoring Will Become Even More Important
Threat intelligence feeds, dark-web monitoring, endpoint telemetry, identity analytics, and automated detection will increasingly be used together to identify attacks before ransomware reaches the encryption stage.
(+1) Early Victim Claims Will Trigger Faster Investigations
Organizations that are publicly named by ransomware groups will increasingly use those announcements as emergency intelligence signals, immediately checking internal systems for evidence of compromise.
(+1) Identity Protection Will Become a Central Defense
As attackers continue to abuse legitimate credentials and remote-access infrastructure, organizations will invest more heavily in phishing-resistant authentication, privileged-access controls, session monitoring, and identity threat detection.
(-1) Ransomware Pressure Will Continue to Increase
The existence of multiple active groups such as Qilin and Bravox suggests that ransomware competition is unlikely to disappear soon. More organizations may face public extortion attempts even when the underlying compromise is relatively limited.
(-1) Data-Leak Extortion Will Remain Difficult to Stop
Even organizations with excellent backups can face serious consequences if attackers successfully steal confidential information. Data protection will therefore remain as important as system recovery.
(-1) False or Exaggerated Claims Will Remain a Problem
Ransomware groups have incentives to portray themselves as more successful than they actually are. Security researchers, journalists, and organizations will need to continue separating genuine compromises from exaggerated or unsupported claims.
(+1) Resilient Organizations Will Gain the Advantage
The organizations most capable of resisting the next ransomware wave will be those that prepare before attackers arrive: minimizing attack surfaces, securing identities, segmenting networks, protecting backups, monitoring data movement, and practicing incident response.
Final Assessment
The reported Qilin claim against Clausing and Bravox claim against MEDICOS should currently be viewed as threat intelligence leads rather than independently confirmed breaches. Yet the broader warning is unmistakable. Ransomware remains a highly organized and adaptive threat, and every new victim claim is another reminder that defensive preparation must begin long before an attacker publishes a name on the dark web.
▶️ Related Video (74% Match):
🕵️📝Let’s dive deep and fact‑check.
🎓 Live Courses & Certifications:
Join Undercode Academy for Verified Certifications
🚀 Request a Custom Project:
Secure, high-velocity infrastructure and disruptive technological engineering. Contact our engineering team for high-tier development and proprietary systems:
[email protected]
💎 Smart Architecture | 🛡️ Secure by Design | ⭐ Trusted by Thousands
References:
Reported By: x.com
Extra Source Hub (Possible Sources for article):
https://www.discord.com
Wikipedia
OpenAi & Undercode AI
Image Source:
Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
🔐JOIN OUR CYBER WORLD [ CVE News • HackMonitor • UndercodeNews ]
📢 Follow UndercodeNews & Stay Tuned:
𝕏 formerly Twitter 🐦 | @ Threads | 🔗 Linkedin | 🦋BlueSky | 🐘Mastodon | 📺Youtube
