AI Tools Turned into Cyber Traps: How Hackers Use ChatGPT & Luma AI for Malware Campaigns

Listen to this Post

Featured Image

The Rise of AI-Themed Malware Campaigns

As artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT and Luma AI explode in popularity, threat actors are turning this trend into a powerful weapon for launching sophisticated malware campaigns. These attackers are capitalizing on users’ eagerness to explore AI by manipulating search engines with Black Hat SEO tactics, effectively hijacking the curiosity of millions. The strategy is simple but dangerous: lure users searching for AI downloads to well-crafted, malicious websites and deliver hidden payloads that can steal data, disable antivirus tools, or even inject crypto-stealing extensions.

In a recent investigation by Zscaler ThreatLabz, researchers uncovered a deeply layered malware distribution chain that begins with fake AI-themed blog sites ranking high on search results. Once clicked, these sites redirect users through a multi-step funnel where browser data is collected, encrypted, and evaluated before the final malware is served. The malicious payloads include infamous strains like Vidar Stealer, Lumma Stealer, and Legion Loader, each wrapped in massive installer files to avoid detection. Attackers use obfuscation techniques like AutoIT loaders, DLL sideloading, and process hollowing to mask their malicious intent. This campaign isn’t just a one-off—it’s a blueprint for how cybercriminals are adapting to the AI wave and turning public interest into vulnerability.

AI Platforms as Cybercrime Gateways

Hijacking AI Searches with Black Hat SEO

Threat actors are exploiting trending AI-related keywords such as “ChatGPT download” or “Luma AI blog” to poison search engine results. These fraudulent sites mimic real AI platforms and push themselves to the top of search rankings using SEO manipulation, effectively hijacking organic discovery paths.

Redirect Chains: The Invisible Trap

Once a user visits a compromised site, a series of deceptive redirects begins. A malicious JavaScript is launched, fingerprinting the browser by collecting data like cookies, user agent, and screen resolution. This data is encrypted with a randomly generated XOR key and sent to a command center server. Only users who meet certain criteria—based on IP and device data—are redirected to the actual malware payload, making it harder for security researchers and sandboxes to replicate the behavior.

Massive Installers Designed to Evade Detection

Malware like Vidar and Lumma Stealer are delivered via large 800MB NSIS installers. These oversized packages are crafted to slip past automated defenses that might ignore such bulky files. Inside, misleading file extensions hide the malware, which is unpacked and launched via AutoIT scripts.

Antivirus Neutralization Tactics

Before executing the stealer payloads, these installers check for antivirus processes from major vendors such as Avast, BitDefender, Norton, and ESET. If found, the malware attempts to terminate them, clearing the path for unimpeded infection.

Legion Loader: A Multi-Stage Threat

Legion Loader operates through a password-protected ZIP file and an MSI installer. A custom DLL named DataUploader.dll collects system info and reaches out to a C2 server to fetch a dynamic password. Then, using 7zip extraction, sideloading, and process hollowing, it deploys malicious code into legitimate processes like explorer.exe.

Targeting Crypto Assets and Browser Data

In some cases, the final payloads have included browser extensions aimed at stealing cryptocurrency. This signals a clear shift in malware goals—no longer just stealing login credentials but also focusing on crypto wallets and financial data.

CDN Hosting and Obfuscation for Persistence

The malware scripts are hosted on trusted CDNs such as AWS CloudFront, making takedown difficult. Furthermore, they come equipped with adblocker detection to avoid being analyzed in researcher environments. Obfuscation continues with Base64-encoded configuration strings, keeping the campaign under the radar.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

Dozens of malicious domains and file hashes associated with this campaign have been identified, such as chat-gpt-5[.]ai, luma-ai[.]com, and gettrunkhomuto[.]info. These domains act as redirection nodes or C2 servers involved in the attack lifecycle.

What Undercode Say:

The AI Craze Is the New Cybercrime Frontier

The intersection of AI hype and digital trust has opened a dangerous new door for cybercriminals. As millions of users seek tools like ChatGPT or Luma AI, attackers are manipulating that traffic to funnel users into infection chains. The trust people place in these tools—especially new or unofficial versions—makes them ideal bait.

Weaponizing Curiosity Through SEO Poisoning

Search engine optimization is no longer just for marketers. In the hands of cybercriminals, it becomes a weapon. The use of Black Hat SEO to manipulate search results allows malicious actors to gain visibility without exploiting software vulnerabilities. It’s a psychological exploit that preys on users’ assumptions.

Malicious Innovation Keeps Outpacing Detection

The use of large file sizes, dynamic redirection, and behavior-aware scripts shows a high level of sophistication. Antivirus evasion by terminating known processes is especially troubling, as it demonstrates active defense circumvention rather than passive stealth.

Infrastructure Obfuscation Raises the Bar

Hosting malware scripts on platforms like AWS CloudFront and encoding configurations in Base64 makes traditional detection almost obsolete. Even seasoned analysts may struggle to detect such attacks without behavioral data and anomaly detection at the network level.

AI-Related Terms Will Keep Being Abused

The broader implication is that any popular AI trend or tool is a potential vector for abuse. As new platforms rise, they will likely be mimicked, poisoned, and used as bait—unless proactive security measures are taken across the ecosystem.

Browser Extensions as the Final Strike

The use of malicious extensions for cryptocurrency theft signifies a tactical evolution. Extensions live in a browser environment where they can access cookies, autofill data, and even credentials. By planting these directly in browsers, attackers bypass several layers of OS-level security.

Targeted Infection Avoids Security Labs

Fingerprinting user devices and aborting the attack if adblockers or analysis environments are detected ensures that malware only activates on real, unprotected users. This makes reverse-engineering difficult and complicates early detection.

Implications for Security Teams

Security analysts must rethink how they monitor AI-themed traffic. Simply blocking known malicious domains is insufficient. URL behavior analysis, sandbox inspection with deception tools, and real-time user education become paramount in defending against such layered threats.

Policy and User Behavior Need to Adapt

From an enterprise perspective, restrictions on AI tool downloads from unofficial sources should become policy. Meanwhile, end users need education about the risks of clicking on trending tools without verification. Curiosity without caution can now open the door to system-level compromise.

🔍 Fact Checker Results:

✅ Zscaler ThreatLabz confirmed the malware campaign linked to fake AI sites
✅ Malware includes Vidar, Lumma, and Legion, all actively used in cybercrime
✅ Scripts are hosted on AWS and feature anti-analysis mechanisms for evasion

📊 Prediction:

🔼 As AI platforms grow, more malware campaigns will target related keywords
🧠 Expect future malware to include AI impersonation bots or fake assistants
đŸ’» Cybersecurity solutions will increasingly rely on AI-driven behavior analysis to keep pace with evolving threats

References:

Reported By: cyberpress.org
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.quora.com/topic/Technology
Wikipedia
OpenAi & Undercode AI

Image Source:

Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2

Join Our Cyber World:

💬 Whatsapp | 💬 Telegram