Listen to this Post
Introduction
A new wave of security concerns has hit the enterprise software world as Ivanti, a key player in endpoint management, has disclosed two freshly identified vulnerabilities affecting its Endpoint Manager Mobile (EPMM) product. These issues, if left unpatched, can be exploited together to allow attackers full remote control over systems. Although Ivanti claims the number of known cases is limited, the nature of these vulnerabilitiesâunauthenticated access and remote code executionâmakes this a high-priority situation for any organization using the affected software.
This alert is more than just another security bulletin. It represents a pattern of recurring issues with Ivanti software, some of which are still being actively exploited. As cybersecurity threats become more sophisticated and persistent, knowing the implications of these flaws is vital for IT teams across the globe. Here’s everything you need to know about the latest vulnerability disclosure, whatâs at risk, and how to stay protected.
Overview of the Security Vulnerabilities
Ivanti has released a security update addressing two serious vulnerabilities in its Endpoint Manager Mobile (EPMM) platform. These two flawsâCVE-2025-4427 and CVE-2025-4428âcan be chained together to allow unauthenticated remote code execution, giving cybercriminals complete access to compromised devices.
CVE-2025-4427 is an authentication bypass vulnerability in the API component of EPMM. This flaw allows attackers to reach resources that are otherwise protected, acting as a door-opener to deeper system functions. Once through that door, CVE-2025-4428 comes into play. This second flaw enables remote code execution through specially crafted API requests, effectively granting the attacker control of the targeted system.
Ivanti has responded by issuing patches in several software versions: 11.12.0.5, 12.3.0.2, 12.4.0.2, and 12.5.0.1. The company emphasizes that only the on-premises version of EPMM is affected; the cloud-based Ivanti Neurons for MDM, Ivanti Sentry, and other Ivanti products are not vulnerable to this exploit chain.
While Ivanti has not disclosed which open-source libraries are involved, it did confirm that the flaws are tied to two third-party components. The company recommends all customers using the on-prem EPMM product to immediately apply the available patches and contact support for further mitigation steps.
Shadowserver data reveals that hundreds of vulnerable EPMM instances are exposed online, especially in countries like Germany and the U.S., amplifying the urgency to act. In addition to these EPMM flaws, Ivanti has also patched a critical authentication bypass vulnerability (CVE-2025-22462) in its Neurons for ITSM and a default credentials vulnerability (CVE-2025-22460) in its Cloud Services Appliance (CSA).
This
What Undercode Say:
Ivantiâs latest advisory once again highlights a recurring issue in the enterprise software ecosystemâpersistent security flaws that are discovered only after exploitation begins. While the companyâs swift patch rollout is commendable, the lack of transparency regarding the open-source components involved raises concerns about the software supply chain’s visibility and accountability.
What makes this case especially dangerous is the nature of the two flaws. CVE-2025-4427 enables attackers to bypass authentication checks, which is often the first layer of defense in any secure system. When this is paired with CVE-2025-4428âallowing for remote code executionâthe impact becomes catastrophic. Essentially, a threat actor could move from initial access to complete control of the system without even being authenticated.
Enterprises still relying on the on-premises version of EPMM need to question their risk management strategies. This vulnerability chain offers cybercriminals an effortless attack vector, and with public internet exposure in high numbers, especially in developed economies, the clock is ticking. Organizations must not only patch but also revisit their architecture choices. Is maintaining on-prem systems worth the added risk when the cloud versions are not affected?
This situation also signals a broader problem in software development: reliance on third-party libraries without adequate tracking or accountability. Ivantiâs reluctance to name the open-source components used in their platform adds opacity where transparency is essential. It underscores the need for SBOMs (Software Bill of Materials) and stronger supply chain standards in enterprise-grade software.
Furthermore, Ivanti is not a stranger to these headlines. From VPN flaws to gateway breaches, attackers have repeatedly found ways to exploit their infrastructure. When multiple zero-day vulnerabilities from the same vendor become a pattern, itâs no longer just a matter of patchingâit’s a wake-up call to reassess vendor trust and implementation models.
Ivantiâs dual responseâpatches and urging customers to contact supportâis appropriate but incomplete. Customers need detailed forensics support, threat detection capabilities, and indicators of compromise, not vague reassurances. Security is no longer just about reactive patching; itâs about proactive defense, clear vendor communication, and long-term resilience.
Lastly, this incident stresses the importance of keeping up-to-date with advisories not just from vendors, but from independent organizations like the FBI and CISA. Their prior alerts about Ivanti vulnerabilities being actively exploited show that this is a known target in the hacker community. Waiting until your infrastructure is under attack is no longer an acceptable strategy.
Fact Checker Results
The vulnerabilities have been confirmed and assigned official CVE IDs: CVE-2025-4427 and CVE-2025-4428.
Only on-prem EPMM instances are affected, not
The flaws have been successfully exploited in a limited number of cases prior to disclosure.
Prediction
Given Ivanti’s history with recurring zero-day flaws and its widespread enterprise use, it’s highly likely that attackers will continue to probe for new vulnerabilities in both on-prem and hybrid deployments. Expect to see increased targeting of unpatched systems, especially in regions with high exposure. Organizations still running on-prem solutions should strongly consider migrating to cloud-based alternatives where security patches can be rolled out more efficiently and attack surfaces are more tightly controlled.
References:
Reported By: www.bleepingcomputer.com
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.pinterest.com
Wikipedia
Undercode AI
Image Source:
Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
