Elon Musk Advised by Father to Stay Out of Politics Amid Trump Feud

Introduction: A Father’s Caution in a Polarizing Era

In a time when tech billionaires are becoming increasingly entangled with politics, Errol Musk—father of Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk—has publicly offered advice that underscores the growing tension between personal beliefs, political discourse, and business integrity. Amid Elon Musk’s ongoing and very public clash with former U.S. President Donald Trump, Errol Musk has called for calm, focus, and strategic silence. While Elon continues to challenge the political landscape, especially on issues like federal spending and electric vehicle mandates, his father is urging a different path—one grounded in business priorities and communication.

Original

Errol Musk has offered some candid advice to his son Elon: “stay silent” and concentrate on business, particularly Tesla. In an interview cited by Al-Arabiya English, Errol emphasized the complexity and volatility of political affairs, suggesting that Elon should avoid further public political confrontations. He admitted he was surprised by Elon’s feud with Donald Trump, calling the conflict confusing and unnecessary.

Despite their differences, Errol expressed hope that something positive could emerge from the situation. Interestingly, he voiced support for Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” a major federal spending proposal focused on infrastructure and economic revitalization—something Errol believes America urgently needs. In contrast, Elon Musk has been a vocal critic of the bill, going so far as to threaten the creation of a new political party—the “America Party”—if the bill passes through the Senate.

Tensions escalated when Trump lashed out at Musk on Truth Social, calling the electric vehicle (EV) mandate “ridiculous” and questioning Musk’s loyalty. Trump reminded the public that he was always against EV mandates, even before Musk endorsed him for the presidency. He made it clear that while he doesn’t oppose EVs, he resists forcing them upon consumers.

Errol Musk, meanwhile, urged Trump to “listen to Elon” and characterized his son as intelligent and far from naive. In closing, he advised both men to “talk it out,” suggesting that dialogue may resolve the tension. The divide between father and son in their views on politics highlights the broader generational and ideological splits within elite circles.

What Undercode Say:

The Errol-Elon dynamic offers a rare glimpse into how family, business, and political ideology intersect in the upper echelons of power. Errol Musk’s statements are striking not only because they come from a figure close to Elon, but also because they provide a voice of moderation at a time when Elon seems to be veering into more extreme political posturing.

Errol’s appeal to “stay silent” might be more than fatherly concern—it could be a strategic nudge toward damage control. Elon’s engagement with controversial issues, such as EV mandates, immigration, and federal budget bills, risks alienating key stakeholders: investors, regulators, and even consumers. Silence, in this case, might be golden—especially in volatile election cycles.

The backdrop to this public feud is also important: Elon Musk’s companies stand at the center of several politically charged industries—EVs, space, AI, and social media. Any federal budget shift or mandate can have ripple effects on Tesla’s stock value, SpaceX’s contracts, or even how X (formerly Twitter) operates. Errol’s emphasis on business-first isn’t nostalgia; it’s pragmatism.

Meanwhile, the father-son divergence on Trump’s infrastructure bill shows how even within families, ideological fractures can emerge. Errol’s support of the bill as a necessary national investment contrasts with Elon’s libertarian skepticism of government spending. While Elon sees federal expansion as overreach, Errol sees it as overdue maintenance.

Trump’s retaliation against Musk is politically calculated. In questioning Musk’s loyalty, Trump taps into a populist narrative that paints elite entrepreneurs as opportunists who shift alliances based on convenience. His rejection of the EV mandate is likely more about signaling to his base than actual policy mechanics.

Errol’s call for conversation—“talk it out”—may be naive in today’s scorched-earth political climate, but it’s also a throwback to a more civil form of disagreement. Whether such a détente is possible between Elon and Trump remains doubtful, especially with both figures known for dominating the spotlight.

Finally, the threat of the “America Party” is a wildcard. It’s unclear whether Musk has the political machinery or long-term interest to launch a viable third party. But the threat alone disrupts the bipartisan narrative and shows that tech titans are not content to sit on the sidelines.

isn’t just a political spat—it’s a proxy war over the future of American policy, business influence, and media power. Errol Musk’s intervention adds an unexpected human dimension to an otherwise ideological battlefield.

🔍 Fact Checker Results:

✅ Errol Musk did publicly advise Elon to focus on business and avoid political distraction, as cited by Al-Arabiya English.

✅ Elon Musk has expressed criticism of

✅ Trump did respond on Truth Social, reaffirming his opposition to EV mandates and questioning Musk’s loyalty.

📊 Prediction:

The feud between Trump and Musk is unlikely to resolve quickly, especially as both seek influence over America’s political narrative heading into 2026. If Trump regains traction for another presidential run, expect further clashes over EV policy, media control, and government subsidies. Elon Musk may escalate his political presence, possibly testing the waters for a populist-libertarian tech coalition. Meanwhile, Errol’s voice will likely fade from the spotlight—but his warning could prove prophetic if Elon’s political gambits begin to affect Tesla’s or SpaceX’s valuations.