Hackers Use PyBitmessage to Launch Stealthy Backdoor and Monero Mining Campaign

Listen to this Post

Featured Image

Introduction:

Cybersecurity researchers at the AhnLab Security Intelligence Center (ASEC) have exposed a highly evasive malware campaign that breaks conventional barriers by exploiting a little-known protocol: Bitmessage. This advanced attack utilizes PyBitmessage — a Python implementation of the peer-to-peer Bitmessage communication protocol — to discreetly transmit malicious commands and operate under the radar of traditional antivirus and network defenses. The malicious toolkit includes a backdoor and a Monero miner, deployed with precision and designed for stealth, making it a serious concern for both enterprises and individual users alike.

Inside the Campaign: How Hackers Are Mining Monero in the Shadows

The new cyberattack campaign uncovered by ASEC is not your average malware drop. At its core, the attackers are distributing two key components: a stealthy backdoor and a Monero coin miner. The infection begins with the execution of a rigged file, which decrypts and releases both the miner and the backdoor from its resource section using XOR operations — a classic obfuscation trick.

Once triggered, the Monero miner installs essential files like config.json, WinRing0x64.sys, and idle_maintenance.exe into a temporary system directory. It then silently hijacks system resources, funneling them into mining cryptocurrency. Monero is specifically chosen due to its focus on privacy and anonymity, making it nearly impossible to trace.

Meanwhile, the real innovation lies in the backdoor. Instead of using standard command-and-control (C2) communication over HTTP or direct IP, it uses PyBitmessage. Bitmessage is a decentralized, encrypted messaging protocol designed for anonymous communication — perfect for attackers trying to blend in with regular traffic. The malware fetches the PyBitmessage library from GitHub or Russian-affiliated file-sharing sites, hiding in plain sight.

This backdoor listens for local POST requests and uses files packed with PyInstaller. These files are unpacked into a temp directory and include QtGui4.dll, indicating clear efforts to confuse detection tools. Once installed, it establishes persistence and awaits encrypted instructions, often in the form of PowerShell scripts — a tactic that enables fileless, hard-to-trace execution.

The combination of decentralized C2, anonymous messaging, and open-source tools makes this attack particularly hard to identify and mitigate. Distribution methods often include disguising malware as cracked software and sharing it on torrent or warez platforms.

ASEC urges users to avoid unverified downloads and monitor peer-to-peer communication closely. Updating operating systems and endpoint security tools is also critical in resisting this emerging threat.

What Undercode Say:

This campaign marks a disturbing evolution in cyberattack strategy. While malware and cryptominers are nothing new, the choice to use PyBitmessage as a communication layer significantly raises the difficulty bar for defenders. Traditional security models assume that malicious C2 traffic will exhibit detectable patterns. But with Bitmessage, everything is encrypted, decentralized, and indistinguishable from legitimate traffic — a nightmare scenario for analysts.

The use of PyInstaller and the disguise of malware as cracked or pirated software is particularly effective among less cyber-aware users, especially in regions where such downloads are common. Coupled with native PowerShell execution, this allows the malware to operate entirely in memory, avoiding many antivirus scans altogether.

What makes this even more dangerous is that PyBitmessage is a legitimate open-source project. Blocking it across the board would interfere with legitimate use cases, making mitigation non-trivial. Security tools are often ill-equipped to parse encrypted P2P traffic, meaning that even deep packet inspection offers little help here.

Another notable aspect is the geographic fingerprint — many of the payload sources trace back to Russian-affiliated platforms. This fits a broader pattern seen in recent state-affiliated or independent cybercrime groups operating from that region.

Also important is the use of Monero. Unlike Bitcoin, which leaves a public ledger, Monero’s privacy-first design ensures that transactions cannot be easily traced. This means that even if an attacker’s wallet is identified, connecting it to a real-world identity is nearly impossible.

From a defensive standpoint, the best strategy right now involves layered security: endpoint detection and response (EDR), behavior-based analytics, and robust network monitoring capable of flagging suspicious anomalies rather than relying solely on signature-based detection.

There’s also a policy implication here. As more threat actors leverage encrypted P2P protocols, organizations might need to rethink how they define acceptable traffic within their networks. Blocking entire classes of software like Bitmessage could be considered, though this has drawbacks for freedom of use and innovation.

The attack vector — luring victims through cracked software — also highlights the continued risk of social engineering. Users need to be educated that downloading from shady platforms carries risks that extend far beyond adware.

In conclusion, this is not just another cryptomining campaign. It’s a playbook for future malware operations: decentralized, stealthy, and nearly impossible to trace using traditional tools. Security teams must adapt fast or be left exposed.

Fact Checker Results:

✔ Bitmessage is indeed a decentralized, encrypted messaging protocol
✔ PyBitmessage is publicly available on GitHub and has legitimate use cases
✔ Monero is widely known for untraceable transactions and is popular among cybercriminals

🔍💣🛡

Prediction:

As more threat actors observe the success of this PyBitmessage-based strategy, similar campaigns will likely emerge in 2025 and beyond. Expect to see other open-source communication tools abused for command-and-control operations. Security vendors will need to invest heavily in detecting encrypted P2P communication patterns. Additionally, organizations that fail to monitor application-level behavior may become prime targets for next-generation malware.

References:

Reported By: cyberpress.org
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.twitter.com
Wikipedia
Undercode AI

Image Source:

Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2

Join Our Cyber World:

💬 Whatsapp | 💬 Telegram