Listen to this Post
India’s cyber ecosystem has entered a dangerous new phase. A potent mix of state-sponsored threat actors, hacktivist alliances, and advanced malware tools has escalated into what experts are calling a hybrid cyber war. Operation Sindoor, spearheaded by the notorious APT36 group with aid from Sidecopy and at least 35 hacktivist factions, marks a significant turning point in the country’s digital defense narrative.
The scale, timing, and coordination of the campaign point to a well-planned strategy that blends espionage with disruption, psychological warfare, and long-term infiltration. This coordinated digital assault didn’t just aim to breach systems—it targeted India’s sovereignty, national morale, and global posture.
India’s Cyber Crisis Unfolded: The Operation Sindoor Campaign
Operation Sindoor came to light after anomalous activity was first observed on April 17, 2025, within Indian government systems. These early signs unraveled a far-reaching cyber offensive designed to breach national infrastructure through spear-phishing, fake websites, and custom malware.
The attackers used emotionally charged lures, such as references to the Pahalgam Terror Attack, to trick users into downloading malicious files disguised as PowerPoint or Excel documents (.xlam, .ppam, .pptx.lnk). Once opened, these files launched stealthy macros and scripts that established connections with malicious command-and-control servers like fogomyart[.]com, initiating deep system penetration.
What set this operation apart was the evolution in APT36’s toolkit. The group replaced its older Poseidon loader with the more evasive and modular Ares RAT. Delivered via fake Indian domains like zohidsindia[.]com and nationaldefensecollege[.]com, Ares enabled capabilities such as keystroke logging, credential harvesting, remote control, and screen monitoring—tools designed to evade detection and maintain persistence.
From May 7 to May 10, Seqrite Labs detected a surge of coordinated DDoS attacks and website defacements across Indian sectors like defense, healthcare (AIIMS), telecom, and education. The disruption wasn’t isolated; it was broadcast and coordinated via Telegram under hashtags like OpIndia and OperationSindoor.
A total of 650+ DDoS incidents were recorded, while at least 35 hacktivist groups, including seven newly formed ones, actively participated. The attackers used spoofed domains such as pahalgamattack[.]com and sindoor[.]website to increase legitimacy and lower user suspicion.
The operation had tangible consequences:
Data Exfiltration: Sensitive government data, credentials, and user files were stolen.
DDoS Disruptions: Citizen services and official portals were rendered unusable.
Defacements: Government websites were vandalized, spreading fear and discrediting authorities.
APT36 also adopted advanced evasion tactics, including the use of living-off-the-land binaries (LOLBins), UAC bypasses, and heavily obfuscated PowerShell scripts to maintain covert access for extended periods.
Indian cybersecurity authorities, particularly Seqrite Labs, responded swiftly by deploying 26 custom malware detection signatures, improving real-time alerting, and initiating dark web surveillance. However, the broader message is chilling—India’s digital warfront is now a battlefield that spans beyond state borders and includes ideological cyber-activists.
What Undercode Say:
Operation Sindoor isn’t just another cyberattack—it reflects a paradigm shift in how conflicts are fought. In today’s hyperconnected world, war isn’t limited to tanks and missiles; it’s fought with phishing emails, fake websites, and silent scripts buried deep in systems.
APT36’s collaboration with hacktivists reveals a disturbing trend: the merging of traditional espionage with guerrilla-style digital insurgency. This creates a decentralized, harder-to-track threat landscape. Instead of a clear enemy with a single objective, defenders now face a fluid coalition driven by different motives—political, ideological, and strategic.
The use of emotionally triggering content, like the Pahalgam reference, shows a nuanced psychological warfare strategy. The attackers didn’t just want to steal data—they wanted to shake national confidence, weaponize public sentiment, and sow chaos. It’s an advanced playbook borrowed from military doctrine and applied digitally.
Moreover, the strategic selection of sectors—healthcare, education, defense—is not coincidental. These sectors impact the public psyche and day-to-day functionality. By compromising them, the attackers maximize chaos and minimize resistance.
From a technical standpoint, Operation Sindoor demonstrates how rapidly malware ecosystems are evolving. The Ares RAT, deployed via spoofed Indian domains, showcases modularity, stealth, and adaptability. It’s no longer about brute-force attacks but about intelligence-driven, long-term infiltration designed to stay dormant until activated.
India’s response has been robust, with XDR deployment and threat hunting initiatives, but it’s clear that defense alone won’t suffice. This calls for a multi-layered, cross-sectoral strategy combining public awareness, policy enforcement, international collaboration, and real-time intelligence sharing.
Cyberattacks like these will become increasingly common. What’s new is the sophistication, timing, and coordination—mirroring full-scale military campaigns. The lessons here extend beyond India. Every nation with growing digital infrastructure must treat cyber defense not as a technical department but as a pillar of national security.
Fact Checker Results ✅
🔍 APT36 is a known state-sponsored threat actor affiliated with Pakistan.
💣 Operation
📊 Over 650 DDoS incidents and 35+ hacktivist involvements are supported by official telemetry logs.
Prediction 📡
Expect increased cyber offensives targeting critical infrastructure in South Asia over the next 12 months. Hacktivist alliances will become more organized, mimicking nation-state sophistication. India is likely to enhance its cyber doctrine, potentially forming a national task force to address hybrid digital threats with both offensive and defensive capabilities.
References:
Reported By: cyberpress.org
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.linkedin.com
Wikipedia
Undercode AI
Image Source:
Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
