New York Governor Urges Lawmakers to Use AI for Oversight: ChatGPT at the Heart of Political Debate

Listen to this Post

Featured Image

Introduction:

At the recent AI+ Summit in New York, Governor Kathy Hochul made headlines by suggesting lawmakers should turn to ChatGPT for help understanding dense legislation. Her remarks, while seemingly humorous, touched on a larger truth about the growing role of artificial intelligence in politics, governance, and public safety. In a pointed exchange with Axios’ Ina Fried, Hochul didn’t just call out political peers — she highlighted how AI can be both a solution and a concern, especially in matters ranging from regulatory control to protecting children online. As New York positions itself at the forefront of AI policy, Hochul’s comments open up a broader discussion about accountability, innovation, and the potential risks of legislative ignorance in the age of emerging technologies.

Main Overview (30-Line Summary):

Governor Kathy Hochul of New York used the AI+ Summit stage to shine a spotlight on the political contradictions surrounding artificial intelligence and its regulation. In a not-so-subtle jab, she critiqued lawmakers, particularly targeting Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, for voting on a Republican-backed spending bill that includes a controversial 10-year ban on AI regulation by states and municipalities — a detail Greene claimed to be unaware of. Hochul sarcastically suggested that lawmakers could have simply asked ChatGPT for a breakdown of the bill’s contents before casting their votes. This exchange wasn’t just political theater. Hochul used the moment to highlight how AI can be a tool for legislative transparency, offering both caution and guidance for how the technology should be implemented and regulated.

She criticized the GOP’s bill provision as “concerning,” especially as it could undermine state-level protections against the exploitation of minors online, a cause she is particularly passionate about as New York’s first woman and “mom governor.” Hochul emphasized that while AI poses dangers, it also holds massive potential — especially in boosting productivity within government services like the DMV. Her stance is that AI should be harnessed to improve lives without replacing jobs or endangering vulnerable populations. Additionally, she reaffirmed New York’s intent to challenge the federal government on issues like offshore wind energy, congestion pricing, and birthright citizenship. Hochul’s remarks come at a time when industry leaders and tech experts, including Mary Meeker, are intensely focused on the global race to control AI and how it is transforming various sectors.

What Undercode Say:

Governor Kathy Hochul’s statements at the AI+ Summit are emblematic of a growing intersection between politics and technology — particularly in how AI is being understood, weaponized, and potentially misused at the legislative level. Her comments targeting Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene are part sarcasm, part strategy. They expose a significant flaw in modern governance: lawmakers voting on legislation without full comprehension. In the digital age, ignorance is no longer excusable when tools like ChatGPT can parse bills within seconds. This not only highlights the power of AI in promoting government transparency but also the danger when such technology is ignored or misunderstood by those in power.

The 10-year ban on local and state AI regulation is particularly alarming. It reveals a top-down federal attempt to centralize AI oversight, potentially stifling local innovation and blocking state-level protective measures. For a state like New York, which has taken aggressive steps to legislate against AI-driven harms — especially those involving the sexual exploitation of minors — this ban represents a rollback in digital rights and protections. Hochul’s framing of this issue from a maternal perspective adds moral weight, but it also strategically positions her as a responsible, forward-thinking leader in a chaotic AI landscape.

Her vision of using AI to improve public services like DMVs or municipal offices is a balanced approach. It reflects an understanding of AI’s dual nature — as both a disruptive force and a powerful enhancer of efficiency. By pushing for ethical implementation instead of resistance or blind acceptance, Hochul sets a precedent for how government entities can work with technology rather than be overtaken by it.

Moreover, her offhand comment about not having enough time to list all the things that should be challenged in the Trump administration adds a sharp political tone. It suggests that Hochul is positioning herself and New York as bulwarks against conservative AI policy — particularly those driven by market deregulation and federal overreach.

Mary Meeker’s 2024 AI Trends report, which coincided with the Summit, further underscores the importance of Hochul’s warnings. Meeker highlights the rapid global adoption of AI, with enterprises, governments, and consumers transforming daily routines. In that light, the idea of banning state-level AI regulation becomes even more troubling. Without localized oversight, emerging harms could go unchecked, and innovation could be stifled by bureaucratic bottlenecks in Washington.

The broader context is clear: America is racing to define how AI will be governed, and Hochul is among the few political leaders treating this challenge with the urgency and nuance it deserves. Her remarks weren’t just political jabs — they were a call for accountability, transparency, and intelligent adaptation in an AI-driven future.

Fact Checker Results:

✅ Did Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene vote for the bill with the AI ban? → Yes 🟢
✅ Is there a 10-year AI regulation ban in the GOP bill? → Yes 🟢
❌ Was Greene unaware of the AI ban in the bill? → Likely No 🔴

Prediction:

📉 Expect increasing political tension around AI regulation as states like New York push back against federal restrictions.
🧠 AI literacy will become a must-have for lawmakers, potentially leading to new tools and protocols for bill analysis.
📊 States may create coalitions or legal challenges to fight the 10-year AI regulation ban, framing it as a state sovereignty issue.

References:

Reported By: axioscom_1749072697
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.reddit.com
Wikipedia
Undercode AI

Image Source:

Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2

Join Our Cyber World:

💬 Whatsapp | 💬 Telegram