OpenAI Faces Complaint Over Chatbot’s False Accusations

ChatGPT Under Fire for Spreading Misinformation

OpenAI is once again under scrutiny after a privacy watchdog filed a complaint against its AI chatbot, ChatGPT, for spreading false and defamatory information. The Vienna-based group Noyb (“None of Your Business”) has accused the chatbot of fabricating a shocking crime story about a Norwegian man, falsely portraying him as a murderer.

The case highlights growing concerns over AI-generated misinformation, particularly when it damages reputations. This latest complaint, filed with Norway’s Data Protection Authority (Datatilsynet), demands that OpenAI delete inaccurate outputs, refine its model to prevent future mistakes, and potentially face fines for negligence.

Noyb’s legal expert, Joakim Soederberg, emphasized that European data protection laws require personal information to be accurate. He criticized OpenAI’s reliance on a simple disclaimer stating that ChatGPT can make errors, arguing that this measure is insufficient.

Despite updates that now allow ChatGPT to pull live information from the internet, Noyb claims that previous false accusations remain stored within the system. This case is part of a broader pattern, as OpenAI has faced similar complaints in the past about its AI producing incorrect or harmful content.

What Undercode Says:

The Growing Problem of AI Hallucinations

The issue at the core of this controversy is a phenomenon known as “AI hallucination,” where large language models generate false yet convincing statements. While OpenAI acknowledges that ChatGPT may sometimes produce errors, real-world cases like that of Arve Hjalmar Holmen demonstrate the serious consequences when these mistakes involve people’s reputations.

Ethical and Legal Implications

This case raises significant ethical and legal concerns. If AI chatbots can falsely label someone as a murderer, a corrupt official, or an abuser, what safeguards should be in place to prevent this? Under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), individuals have the right to correct false personal information. However, AI models like ChatGPT do not currently offer users a direct way to amend incorrect details.

The Responsibility of AI Developers

OpenAI has positioned itself as a leader in AI innovation, but with great power comes great responsibility. It must address the following challenges:

Accountability – Should AI companies be held legally responsible for misinformation? If so, what level of liability should they bear?
Transparency – How can AI developers provide more transparency into how their models process and generate information?
Correction Mechanisms – Should AI companies create systems where users can report and correct false information within AI outputs?

Possible Solutions

To mitigate these risks, AI companies like OpenAI could implement:

Automated Fact-Checking: AI models should have built-in verification layers that cross-check generated information before presenting it as fact.
Human Oversight: Deploying AI-human hybrid moderation teams to evaluate flagged content.
User Reporting Tools: Giving users a way to contest and correct false information about them.
Stronger Legal Safeguards: Governments could impose clearer regulations on AI-generated content, ensuring that companies are held accountable for serious errors.

The Bigger Picture

This controversy is not just about a single case—it represents a broader challenge in AI ethics. If unchecked, AI-generated misinformation could become a widespread issue, affecting everything from personal reputations to political discourse. As AI technology advances, regulators, developers, and users must collaborate to create a system that prioritizes accuracy, fairness, and accountability.

Fact Checker Results:

AI hallucinations remain a persistent problem, despite improvements in real-time search capabilities.
Legal experts argue that disclaimers are not enough, and stronger corrective measures should be implemented.
The risk of reputational damage is real, with potential legal consequences for AI companies in the future.

References:

Reported By: https://www.channelstv.com/2025/03/20/chatgpt-faces-complaint-over-false-horror-story/
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.facebook.com
Wikipedia
Undercode AI