Listen to this Post
In a new development emerging from the dark webâs shadows, the notorious ransomware group known as Safepay has added a new name to its victim list â Schapmann. This was confirmed by the ThreatMon Ransomware Monitoring Team, a unit dedicated to tracking ransomware operations and data leaks occurring across dark web forums.
On May 6, 2025, at 16:42 UTC+3, the ThreatMon team observed a new post from the Safepay group claiming responsibility for a successful attack on Schapmann. While limited technical details have been released so far, the public naming of the victim usually precedes the leaking of sensitive data unless the ransom is paid â a common pressure tactic in ransomware extortion.
This update was shared publicly via ThreatMonâs official X (Twitter) account under the handle @TMRansomMon, where they monitor and log the activity of ransomware groups around the world in real time. The group tagged this incident using hashtags like DarkWeb and Ransomware to highlight its cybercrime context.
Timeline and Events
Ransomware Group: Safepay
Victim: Schapmann
Breach Announced: May 6, 2025, 16:42 (UTC+3)
Disclosed By: ThreatMon Ransomware Monitoring
Platform: Dark Web (and public notice on Twitter/X)
Potential Data Leak: Likely, depending on ransom negotiations
Threat Actorâs Tactics: Name-and-shame, possible double extortion
Although the full scope of the attack remains unclear, previous campaigns by Safepay indicate a pattern: after breaching a system, the group encrypts key files, demands a ransom in cryptocurrency, and then threatens to publish or sell the stolen data if demands arenât met. Victims typically include mid-to-large size businesses across Europe and North America, though their reach continues to expand.
What Undercode Say:
The Safepay ransomware gang has been surfacing more frequently in 2025, signaling a growing confidence in their operational strength and evasion tactics. The attack on Schapmann could be indicative of several underlying trends in the ransomware ecosystem.
First, letâs examine the actorâs profile. Safepay is known for its targeted ransomware deployments, often using spear-phishing or exploitation of known software vulnerabilities. Their infrastructure suggests a well-organized team with a grasp on both encryption tech and psychological manipulation.
From a cyber threat intelligence perspective, the naming of Schapmann is the beginning of a multi-phase extortion process. Companies typically face:
Initial system lockout and file encryption
A ransom note demanding crypto payments
Follow-up threats to leak proprietary or personal data
Potential selling of data on underground forums
If the ransom
Interestingly, the timing of the post (evening UTC) aligns with typical dark web update schedules, which often spike during post-business hours in Europe. This maximizes public visibility among underground actors and competitors alike.
The ThreatMon platform plays a crucial role here. Their regular updates are instrumental in alerting businesses and security researchers to emerging threats. By logging IOC (Indicators of Compromise) and C2 (Command & Control) data, they serve as an early warning system for other organizations that might be on the gang’s radar.
Also worth noting is the absence of financial or technical information in the public post. This may suggest negotiations are still ongoing or that the threat actor is waiting for internal communication from Schapmann before escalating the pressure.
This case highlights how modern ransomware is as much a PR game as it is a technical exploit. Naming victims on public platforms has become a norm â a psychological warfare tactic to damage brand trust and force fast payouts.
Fact Checker Results:
ThreatMon is a verified and trusted cyber intelligence source.
Safepay has a history of naming victims before leaking data.
The post timestamp and methodology align with known ransomware behavior.
Prediction
Based on current patterns and the Safepay groupâs operational history, it’s likely that Schapmann will be subjected to additional pressure tactics in the coming days. If a ransom is not paid quickly, sensitive internal data may be leaked as proof of breach. Expect the leak site of Safepay to list samples soon â possibly email archives, internal documents, or employee PII. This incident may serve as a warning for similarly profiled companies to audit their network security posture before theyâre the next target.
References:
Reported By: x.com
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.stackexchange.com
Wikipedia
Undercode AI
Image Source:
Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
