Listen to this Post
Smartwatches Just Got Smarter: The Rise of AI Fitness Coaching
In the battle for wearable tech dominance, Apple and Samsung have taken their rivalry beyond hardware into the AI-driven realm of personalized health coaching. As fitness wearables evolve from passive tracking devices into intelligent companions, the question now becomes: Which brand is truly empowering users to meet their fitness goals?
Apple’s recent announcement of Workout Buddy, an AI-powered coaching feature set to launch with WatchOS 26, promises real-time guidance, historical performance insights, and motivation during workouts. Not to be outdone, Samsung has unveiled Running Coach as part of its One UI 8 update—a specialized feature crafted for runners, delivering adaptive training plans and real-time pace tracking based on the user’s own data.
Let’s break down this head-to-head competition between two of the biggest players in tech—and see where things might go from here.
the Original
The wearable fitness tech race just hit a new gear. Apple recently introduced Workout Buddy, an AI-powered feature on WatchOS 26, which aims to guide users during various types of workouts like running, cycling, walking, strength training, and more. It gives encouragement and real-time stats, providing users with a digital fitness partner tailored to their past performance.
Meanwhile, Samsung responded with Running Coach, an AI-driven feature launching with One UI 8 for Galaxy Watches. Unlike Apple’s more generalist approach, Samsung’s coach is tailored specifically for runners—from 5K newbies to full marathoners. The system evaluates a user’s fitness over a 12-minute run, scoring their performance and offering customized training plans. These plans evolve based on progress, keeping runners challenged without pushing them into injury territory.
Samsung’s focus is on long-term goal setting and safety, using continuous feedback to adapt and motivate users. Apple’s Workout Buddy, in contrast, is more versatile but lacks the same depth in personalized long-range planning. Samsung’s update also includes other health-related features like Bedtime Guidance, though Running Coach is clearly the standout. To experience these, users must enroll in Samsung’s beta program (for Galaxy Watch5 or newer).
The verdict? Both are compelling. Apple offers breadth; Samsung offers depth. But true judgment awaits real-world testing.
🧠 What Undercode Say: Analyzing the AI Fitness Rivalry
1. Specialized vs Generalized Coaching
Samsung’s Running Coach takes a niche approach, zeroing in on runners—one of the most common but injury-prone user groups in fitness. By personalizing training and providing progression-based challenges, it reflects a deep understanding of athletic development. Apple’s Workout Buddy, while more inclusive, opts for breadth over depth, covering a wide variety of activities but without the same granular customization.
2. Real-Time Adaptation
Both systems boast real-time feedback, but Samsung’s reliance on dynamic evaluation (a 12-minute minimum run to start data collection) ensures the coaching is genuinely personalized. Apple appears to focus more on mid-workout motivation than on long-term program structuring.
3. Injury Prevention Strategy
Samsung’s emphasis on avoiding overexertion and customizing plans based on user history shows a proactive approach to health. Injury prevention isn’t just a safety measure—it’s a user retention tactic. Apple, by contrast, hasn’t clearly signaled injury prevention as a core feature, making it slightly reactive in comparison.
4. Gamification & Motivation
The concept of “graduating through training levels” gives Samsung an edge in engagement design. The challenge-unlock model is psychologically rewarding and mirrors how users respond to fitness gamification. Apple’s motivational cues are useful but lack this kind of progressive achievement structure—at least from what we know so far.
5. Ecosystem Integration
Apple’s advantage lies in its tight ecosystem. If Workout Buddy integrates well with Apple Fitness+, iCloud Health, and third-party fitness apps, it could prove more versatile. Samsung has its own ecosystem, but it’s more fragmented between Android versions, hardware, and service partners.
6. Market Differentiation Strategy
Samsung is carving out a performance-driven brand identity in fitness wearables, appealing to serious runners and long-term planners. Apple, true to form, is betting on mass appeal and broad usability. This suggests Samsung may slowly win over athletic purists, while Apple continues to dominate casual fitness users.
7. Beta Access vs Public Rollout
Samsung’s beta-only approach could limit early adoption, while Apple’s marketing machine and universal rollout typically secure higher visibility. However, Samsung’s strategy ensures a refined product upon wide release, which might reduce early bugs and bad reviews.
8. Final Thought
If AI coaching becomes the standard in smartwatches, Samsung’s narrow focus might prove more effective, especially for committed athletes. However, Apple’s flexibility and ecosystem tie-ins give it broad consumer appeal. This is less about who wins today and more about who defines the next generation of fitness experience.
🔍 Fact Checker Results
✅ Samsung’s Running Coach is real and launching via One UI 8 beta.
✅ Apple’s Workout Buddy is confirmed for WatchOS 26 and covers more workout types.
❌ Running Coach doesn’t support cross-training yet; limited to running activities only.
📊 Prediction: The Future of AI Fitness Coaching
By 2026, expect AI health coaching to become a must-have feature across all major wearables. Apple will likely expand Workout Buddy to include long-term programming and perhaps even virtual trainer avatars. Samsung will continue deepening specialized features, potentially introducing AI-guided recovery modes or injury diagnostics.
The winner in this arms race? The user—who will soon enjoy deeply personalized, intelligent, and preventive fitness experiences right from their wrist.
References:
Reported By: www.zdnet.com
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.twitter.com
Wikipedia
OpenAi & Undercode AI
Image Source:
Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
