Listen to this Post
As major retailers face escalating challenges with theft and customer dissatisfaction, Target is taking a bold step by scaling back its self-checkout systems nationwide. This shift marks a notable reversal of a trend that gained traction during the COVID-19 pandemic when contactless shopping became the norm. But times have changed, and so have the risks—and the numbers paint a clear picture.
Target’s Strategic Move Away from Self-Checkout: A 30-Line Summary
Retail giant Target is gradually removing self-checkout kiosks from many of its stores in response to a surge in organized retail theft and complaints about malfunctioning machines. This decision is being driven by a broader industry-wide challenge: shrinkage, a term retailers use to describe losses from theft, fraud, or errors.
As of March, Target began limiting self-checkout usage to 10 items per transaction and started dismantling or reducing the number of kiosks in its locations. The company says this shift not only combats rising retail crime but also addresses frustrations from customers who encountered unreliable technology during their shopping experience.
To counteract the removal of self-checkouts, Target plans to increase the number of staffed checkout lanes, ensuring smoother and more secure customer experiences. This mirrors broader moves in the industry—Walmart, for instance, recently enhanced its self-checkout PIN pads with bright yellow rings to deter skimming devices.
A viral post on Reddit highlighted the change as users observed entire self-checkout sections removed from local stores. According to Target, the surge in self-checkout usage during the pandemic is now waning as in-store shopping stabilizes.
However, the deeper concern lies in security. One egregious case cited involved a California shoplifter who managed to steal over \$60,000 worth of goods across 100 separate self-checkout visits. New York has been hit even harder, with organized crime groups allegedly contributing to \$4.4 billion in annual retail losses. Shoplifting in NYC alone soared by 64% between mid-2019 and mid-2023, with stolen items often funneled into online marketplaces like eBay and Facebook, or shady pawnshop networks.
With theft becoming more organized and sophisticated, companies like Target are being forced to reassess the trade-offs between convenience and security. The rollback of self-checkout appears to be a calculated risk in the war against shrinkage and digital-age shoplifting.
What Undercode Say:
The quiet collapse of self-checkout
Target’s rollback is more than a reactionary measure; it is a signal of shifting priorities in the age of organized retail crime. For years, self-checkouts were seen as a win-win: fewer staff costs for retailers and faster service for consumers. But beneath the surface, they opened new vectors for theft—some opportunistic, others systemic.
The rise of shoplifting syndicates, especially in urban hubs like New York and Los Angeles, demonstrates the way criminal networks have adapted to exploit automation. Surveillance gaps, lack of human oversight, and predictable machine behavior created a low-risk, high-reward ecosystem for thieves.
Analysts have long warned that self-checkout systems are not secure enough to handle high-value inventory without continuous human intervention. The massive \$60,000 theft from a single individual underscores how outdated anti-theft protocols have become when applied to unmanned lanes.
The retail
This trend is a broader indictment of how automation, when improperly implemented, can collapse under real-world criminal stress. Retailers hoped to cut costs; instead, they’re bleeding revenue due to shrinkage, often surpassing 1.5% of sales—a critical threshold for profitability in mass-market retail.
Beyond theft, there’s the matter of customer trust. Frequent machine errors, bagging issues, and price scanning glitches have frustrated shoppers, many of whom would rather deal with a human than wrestle with a temperamental kiosk.
The retail crime wave is forcing an overdue rebalancing act: technology alone cannot replace physical presence and vigilance. What we’re witnessing is the end of self-checkout as a dominant model—and a return to more guarded, human-centric retail operations. It’s not anti-tech; it’s smart tech use in a time of heightened risk.
Target’s swift pivot could inspire other chains to follow suit, especially as consumers continue to voice dissatisfaction with self-checkout experiences and retailers absorb staggering theft-related losses.
As organized retail crime becomes increasingly tech-savvy, the future of in-store security may lie not in reducing staff but in better training, AI-assisted surveillance, and high-engagement human customer service.
Fact Checker Results:
Claim: Target is removing self-checkout machines due to theft.
Status: Confirmed by multiple credible reports including The New York Post.
Claim: Organized retail theft in New York results in billions in losses.
Status: Supported by data from the Council on Criminal Justice.
Claim: Self-checkout theft incidents include a $60K case.
Status: Reported case aligns with Target’s internal loss assessments.
Prediction:
If current trends persist, expect a broader industry retreat from fully automated self-checkouts in favor of hybrid models combining human oversight with digital convenience. Chains like Walgreens, CVS, and even grocery giants may quietly phase out unmanned lanes, especially in high-theft regions. Meanwhile, biometric authentication, AI cameras, and smart carts could emerge as the next wave in retail anti-theft innovation—ushering in not just automation, but accountable automation.
References:
Reported By: timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.twitter.com
Wikipedia
Undercode AI
Image Source:
Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
