Listen to this Post
Shocking Entry Points Uncovered in Tesla’s EV Charger Security
Tesla’s Wall Connector, a cornerstone of the company’s EV ecosystem, has been exposed to serious vulnerabilities during the Pwn2Own Automotive 2025 hacking event in Tokyo. Researchers revealed how attackers could potentially hijack the device using techniques that exploit weaknesses in Tesla’s firmware and communication protocols. The most advanced hack came from the French cybersecurity firm Synacktiv, who managed to take full control of the charger by simulating vehicle communication signals and forcing it to install older, vulnerable firmware. This attack, combined with others discovered at the same event, raises concerns about how EV infrastructure could be used as a backdoor into private home and enterprise networks.
Multiple Teams, Multiple Breaches
The core of the findings at Pwn2Own centered around how different teams leveraged unique strategies to compromise the Tesla Wall Connector. Synacktiv stood out with a complex, multi-stage attack that utilized custom hardware and in-depth knowledge of Tesla’s Single-Wire CAN (SWCAN) protocol. Their exploit initiated through the charger’s Control Pilot line, typically used for basic vehicle-charger communication. By using a Raspberry Pi and modified CAN adapter, they emulated a Tesla vehicle to bypass security checks and downgrade the firmware to version 0.8.58. This outdated firmware exposed debug functions that should have been inaccessible.
From there, they exploited a buffer overflow within the debug shell interface, which gave them the ability to extract Wi-Fi credentials, potentially compromising home or office networks connected to the charger. The exploit even allowed visible signs of success—like blinking the charger’s LED using arbitrary code execution.
In contrast, the PHP Hooligans team exploited a numeric range comparison flaw categorized under CWE-839, which netted them a slightly higher reward of \$50,000. Other teams like PCAutomotive and Summoning Team focused on chaining previously known vulnerabilities, earning lesser prizes.
Tesla responded swiftly by deploying a patch that includes anti-downgrade protections, making it harder to revert firmware to vulnerable versions. However, the revelations underscore how critical EV infrastructure is becoming and why it must be safeguarded as rigorously as other connected systems. With a total of \$129,500 awarded for Tesla-specific hacks, it’s clear that the automotive sector remains a lucrative and essential battleground for cybersecurity research.
What Undercode Say:
Implications for EV Ecosystems
This event shows that EV chargers are no longer passive endpoints but active network participants, potentially exposing critical digital pathways. When an electric vehicle charger can be used as an attack vector to infiltrate home networks, the convergence of automotive and IT security becomes painfully obvious.
The Complexity of Firmware Downgrade Attacks
What makes Synacktiv’s exploit especially concerning is its stealth and sophistication. Downgrade attacks are not new, but using vehicle-simulated signals to trigger the rollback on the charger shows an intimate understanding of Tesla’s proprietary protocols. The lack of firmware signature checks in older versions created a glaring gap that was cleverly weaponized.
Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities Still Persist
Despite decades of awareness, buffer overflow issues still plague embedded systems. This attack proves that even in 2025, if debug shells are not locked down and input parsing isn’t rigorously protected, attackers can easily exploit low-level bugs to gain root access.
Wi-Fi Credential Extraction: A Hidden Threat
By retrieving Wi-Fi credentials (SSID and PSK), the attackers bridged the gap between hardware compromise and broader network infiltration. This turns the charger from a simple hardware exploit into a pivot point for further cyberattacks on any connected IoT or smart home infrastructure.
Inadequate Logging and Intrusion Detection
One silent enabler of this exploit chain is the apparent lack of logging or tamper detection on the Wall Connector. The exploit took nearly 18 minutes to execute, yet there’s no mention of alerts or system defenses engaging. This is problematic, especially for devices expected to operate in unsupervised environments.
Broader Cybersecurity Trends
The Pwn2Own competition serves as a microcosm of broader cybersecurity threats. EV infrastructure, especially as it becomes standardized and widespread, is emerging as a lucrative target for sophisticated threat actors. The exploit techniques used here are not trivial—they require hardware engineering, protocol analysis, and software exploitation—all hallmarks of nation-state or advanced persistent threat (APT) capabilities.
Tesla’s Response: A Good Start, But Not Enough
While Tesla has implemented anti-downgrade protections, the larger issue is the reactive nature of firmware security. The fact that the device could even accept an older firmware version suggests that forward-only upgrade architectures need to become standard in the EV space.
Implications for Regulators and Manufacturers
This event should be a wake-up call for regulators. With EV chargers now critical to both residential and public infrastructure, mandatory security standards and third-party audits should be enforced. Manufacturers must treat EV chargers like any other networked endpoint—with encryption, sandboxing, and runtime security measures.
Future Attacks Could Be More Dangerous
What if the exploit had not just extracted credentials or blinked lights, but had altered power delivery logic, causing damage to vehicles or electrical systems? The potential for sabotage, both digital and physical, cannot be ignored.
Need for Red Teaming in Product Development
Tesla and other EV manufacturers must embed red team testing in their development lifecycle. Waiting for competitions like Pwn2Own to discover vulnerabilities is unsustainable. Building threat models from the start can help prevent such flaws from reaching production.
🔍 Fact Checker Results:
✅ Synacktiv exploited a Tesla Wall Connector using a firmware downgrade and buffer overflow.
✅ Tesla issued a patch post-competition that prevents such rollbacks.
✅ Wi-Fi credentials could be exfiltrated due to debug shell access.
📊 Prediction:
🔮 As EV adoption accelerates, attackers will increasingly focus on peripheral components like chargers, apps, and infotainment units. Expect future threats to move from mere data access to direct physical sabotage of energy systems. More EV charging systems will soon need intrusion detection systems, secure boot, and OTA patch verification to stay ahead of attackers. 🔐⚡
References:
Reported By: cyberpress.org
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.stackexchange.com
Wikipedia
OpenAi & Undercode AI
Image Source:
Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
