Turkish APT Exploits Chat App Zero-Day to Spy on Iraqi Kurds: A Deep Dive into Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

Listen to this Post

Featured Image

Introduction:

Cybersecurity threats are an ongoing concern for global organizations, and when vulnerabilities are exploited, the consequences can be devastating. A recent report revealed a sophisticated attack carried out by a Turkish espionage group targeting the Kurdish military in Iraq. This attack, leveraging a zero-day vulnerability in Output Messenger, showcases the vulnerability of self-hosted enterprise messaging services and the critical need for organizations to maintain constant vigilance in securing their communication infrastructure. Let’s explore the details behind this attack and its broader implications.

the Original

For nearly a year, a Turkish espionage group, known as Sea Turtle or Marbled Dust, has exploited a zero-day vulnerability in the Output Messenger chat app to spy on Kurdish military forces in Iraq. Output Messenger, which markets itself as a secure, private messaging solution, has more than 50,000 downloads on Google Play, making it an appealing choice for organizations managing sensitive communications.

The vulnerability in question, CVE-2025-27920, is a directory traversal flaw that allows attackers to manipulate file paths and place malicious files on the victim’s servers. Once the attackers gain access, they can exploit the file upload feature of Output Messenger to deploy malware and backdoors, enabling ongoing surveillance of the targets.

The Kurdish military group, the Peshmerga, has been a long-time adversary of Turkey, and this espionage campaign exploits the ongoing conflict. Microsoft revealed the attack in a blog post, highlighting that the attackers leveraged DNS hijacking or typosquatting to steal credentials and gain unauthorized access. The attack’s longevity, spanning several months, emphasizes the danger of zero-day vulnerabilities and the importance of timely patching.

Output Messenger’s self-hosting feature, touted as a privacy benefit, may have contributed to the attack’s success. Self-hosting means that organizations are responsible for keeping the software up to date, and the delay in applying patches left these targets vulnerable. This situation underscores the risks of relying on self-hosted applications without ensuring that regular updates and security measures are in place.

What Undercode Says:

The breach of Output Messenger illustrates several key concerns in modern cybersecurity, particularly for organizations handling sensitive data. One of the primary lessons here is the inherent risks involved in self-hosted applications. While hosting software on-premises offers a degree of control over data, it also places the full responsibility of maintaining the software’s security on the organization. The attack on Kurdish military forces is a classic example of how attackers can exploit a vulnerability for months—sometimes even years—before the issue is identified and patched.

Self-hosting also requires a thorough understanding of patch management and the need for proactive defenses, especially when dealing with zero-day vulnerabilities. The delay in the patch release for CVE-2025-27920 is a stark reminder of how quickly cybercriminals can exploit flaws in otherwise trusted systems. Once a vulnerability is discovered, the attackers can move fast, deploying backdoors and maintaining access long after the patch is issued.

Moreover, the sophistication of the Sea Turtle group and their long-term focus on the Kurdish military suggests that espionage campaigns are becoming more advanced and harder to detect. The use of DNS hijacking and typosquatting to steal credentials before deploying malware is an evolving tactic that should be a point of concern for all organizations relying on internet-based communication tools.

The attack’s focus on the Kurdish military, which has had a tense relationship with Turkey for decades, further highlights the geopolitical implications of cybersecurity. State-sponsored cyberattacks are not just about stealing data; they are about gaining strategic advantages in conflicts that span beyond the digital realm.

For any organization using platforms like Output Messenger, the key takeaway is the importance of not only applying patches as soon as they are available but also continuously evaluating the security measures around your infrastructure. With APTs becoming more sophisticated, the line between traditional espionage and cyber warfare is becoming increasingly blurred.

Fact Checker Results:

šŸ” The flaw in Output Messenger, CVE-2025-27920, was indeed a critical directory traversal vulnerability.
šŸ” The Sea Turtle APT group has been active for years, primarily using DNS hijacking to carry out its campaigns.
šŸ” The delay in patching the vulnerability left Kurdish military targets exposed to attacks long after the issue was first identified.

Prediction:

Looking ahead, the trend of self-hosted software being targeted by advanced cybercriminal groups will likely increase. Organizations will need to adapt by implementing more robust security frameworks, such as regular patch management and intrusion detection systems, to defend against the growing sophistication of APTs. Additionally, with cyber warfare becoming more integrated with geopolitical conflicts, it is expected that nation-state actors will continue to refine their cyber capabilities, making cybersecurity a priority for both public and private sector organizations.

References:

Reported By: www.darkreading.com
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.medium.com
Wikipedia
Undercode AI

Image Source:

Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2

Join Our Cyber World:

šŸ’¬ Whatsapp | šŸ’¬ Telegram