Listen to this Post
In an era where technology increasingly shapes how we consume information, a startling new study reveals that relying on AI for news can be risky. Research from the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and the undercode shows that top AI chatbots frequently distort news stories, raising urgent questions about public trust, democracy, and the future of journalism. With AI tools now serving as a primary gateway to information for many, the consequences of misinformation are more immediate and far-reaching than ever.
AI Chatbots Under Scrutiny
The study evaluated AI-generated news responses from ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and Perplexity across 18 countries and 14 languages. Professional journalists assessed thousands of responses for accuracy, sourcing, and the distinction between fact and opinion. Shockingly, 45% of responses contained at least one significant problem, while 20% displayed major accuracy issues, such as fabricated content or outdated information. Google’s Gemini performed the worst, with 76% of its outputs flagged for errors, especially regarding source attribution.
Growing AI News Consumption
The findings come amid growing AI adoption as a news source. According to Reuters Institute’s Digital News Report 2025, 7% of people worldwide use AI tools to keep up with current events, a number that jumps to 15% among those under 25. Despite this, a Pew Research poll in the U.S. found that 75% of adults rarely or never use AI chatbots for news. Yet, even when users do consult AI, many fail to verify information by checking sources, increasing the risk of misinformation spreading unchecked.
Political and Social Implications
EBU Media Director Jean Philip De Tender warned that AI’s systemic inaccuracies threaten public trust. When people cannot reliably distinguish truth from falsehood, democratic participation suffers. The problem is exacerbated by AI-generated video tools, such as OpenAI’s Sora, which can produce realistic but entirely fabricated footage. While watermarks are meant to signal AI generation, users have already found ways to remove them, blurring the line between reality and fabrication even further.
The Rise of AI Video and Information Ecosystems
AI-generated video tools are shifting the perception of evidence. Historically, video served as definitive proof, but with AI, any event can be convincingly simulated. Coupled with the echo chambers of social media algorithms, these tools deepen information fragmentation. Generative AI is accelerating trends already present in the digital media landscape: speed and convenience over verification, engagement over accuracy.
The Shift from Traditional Journalism
Previously, news consumption required investment in trusted sources. People read newspapers or magazines carefully curated by journalists. AI bypasses those hurdles, offering instant, digestible summaries for free—but the new EBU-undercode research shows that these summaries are often riddled with inaccuracies. This convenience comes at the cost of reliability, potentially eroding faith in established news institutions and making society more vulnerable to manipulation.
What Undercode Say: Analyzing the AI News Problem
The implications of these findings go beyond technical errors; they touch on societal trust and the very structure of democracy. AI-generated news is symptomatic of a broader shift where immediacy and personalization have overtaken verification and credibility. Tools like ChatGPT and Gemini are not just producing occasional mistakes—they are fundamentally ill-equipped to judge context, nuance, and the ethical implications of reporting.
This systemic unreliability raises ethical questions about deploying AI in information-critical sectors. While these tools can help journalists summarize data or provide preliminary reporting, over-reliance risks creating a feedback loop of misinformation. Users, especially younger audiences who increasingly rely on AI, may develop habits of unquestioning consumption, further eroding critical thinking skills.
The rise of AI video only compounds the problem. Once a medium considered incontrovertible, video now becomes a platform for potential fabrication. The ethical responsibility of creators, developers, and platforms becomes paramount, as the public struggles to discern fact from fiction. AI, therefore, is not just a technological challenge—it is a societal and cultural one.
Long-term, this trend could lead to a bifurcated information ecosystem: one part guided by rigorous journalism and fact-checking, the other dominated by instant, AI-generated content that may or may not be accurate. Trust, once lost, is difficult to regain, and repeated exposure to flawed AI-generated news could normalize skepticism and cynicism, weakening civic engagement.
The role of regulation and education cannot be understated. Platforms must enforce transparency and ethical standards, while users must be educated on evaluating AI outputs critically. Human oversight, clear sourcing, and verification mechanisms should become mandatory components of AI news tools.
Moreover, AI’s potential should not be ignored. It can enhance research, provide accessibility for global news in multiple languages, and help journalists process vast datasets quickly. However, this potential must be balanced against the risk of undermining trust. Responsible deployment requires collaboration between technologists, journalists, policymakers, and educators.
In short, AI’s promise as a news tool comes with significant caveats. Speed and convenience are seductive, but without rigorous checks, the cost is a misinformed public. AI is a mirror of human priorities—it reflects our demand for instant information while exposing our tolerance for error and sensationalism. Society must decide whether efficiency is worth the risk of eroding the foundations of truth.
Fact Checker Results
✅ Nearly half of AI-generated news responses contain inaccuracies or major issues.
❌ Gemini performed worst, with 76% of outputs flagged for errors.
⚠️ Video AI tools further blur fact and fiction, undermining traditional trust metrics.
Prediction
📊 The use of AI for news will continue to grow, especially among younger audiences.
⚡ Expect increased regulatory scrutiny and demand for ethical AI standards.
🔮 Misinformation risks will escalate without robust verification, potentially reshaping public trust and civic engagement.
🕵️📝✔️Let’s dive deep and fact‑check.
References:
Reported By: www.zdnet.com
Extra Source Hub (Possible Sources for article):
https://www.stackexchange.com
Wikipedia
OpenAi & Undercode AI
Image Source:
Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
Bing
🔐JOIN OUR CYBER WORLD [ CVE News • HackMonitor • UndercodeNews ]
📢 Follow UndercodeNews & Stay Tuned:
𝕏 formerly Twitter 🐦 | @ Threads | 🔗 Linkedin | 🦋BlueSky | 🐘Mastodon
