Critical Security Warning: Brother Printers Expose Users to Unfixable Admin Password Flaw

Listen to this Post

Featured Image

Introduction: A Wake-Up Call for Printer Owners Worldwide

In an age where cybersecurity threats extend beyond laptops and phones, even your office printer could be a ticking time bomb. Recently, security researchers uncovered a severe vulnerability affecting hundreds of Brother printer models — and here’s the kicker: one of the most dangerous flaws cannot be fixed with a traditional update. If you’re using a Brother printer at home or at work, your device could be silently offering hackers a backdoor entry.

This is not just another bug to brush aside — it has the potential to allow full administrative access to your device, risking document theft, system reconfiguration, and credential hijacking. Here’s what’s going on, how to check if your device is affected, and what urgent steps you should take to secure your network.

Summary: A Deep Dive into the Brother Printer Vulnerability

Security firm Rapid7 disclosed eight vulnerabilities affecting 748 printer and label devices, the majority of which (689) are Brother-branded models. The most alarming flaw, CVE-2024-51978, received a 9.8 “Critical” CVSS score, indicating near-maximum severity. This particular vulnerability allows an attacker, armed with just your printer’s serial number, to reverse-engineer its default administrator password — a password many users never bother to change.

This flaw is unpatchable on existing hardware, meaning no firmware update can fix it. The issue lies in Brother’s manufacturing algorithm, which creates predictable default passwords during production. If a hacker can obtain the serial number — potentially through another flaw like CVE-2024-51977 — they can derive the password and gain full admin privileges. This allows them to alter configurations, retrieve scanned files, and in some cases, launch remote code execution (RCE) attacks or steal external-service credentials.

While Brother has released firmware patches for seven of the eight discovered vulnerabilities, CVE-2024-51978 remains unresolved. Beyond Brother, other affected manufacturers include Fujifilm, Ricoh, Toshiba Tec, and Konica Minolta, totaling 748 vulnerable devices.

Here’s the breakdown of affected models:

Brother: 689 devices

Fujifilm: 46 devices

Ricoh: 5 devices

Toshiba Tec: 2 devices

Konica Minolta: 6 devices

The severity of other vulnerabilities ranges from denial-of-service flaws (CVE-2024-51982, CVE-2024-51983) to credential theft (CVE-2024-51984). Not every model is susceptible to every flaw, but the cumulative impact is significant.

Users can check if their printer is affected via a PDF list published on Brother’s support page. For seven of the eight issues, firmware updates are available and should be installed immediately. But for CVE-2024-51978, your only protection is to manually change the default admin password using the Web-Based Management interface on your printer.

This incident underscores a broader cybersecurity lesson: default credentials are an open invitation to attackers. Change them, regardless of the device.

What Undercode Say:

This incident is a textbook example of how overlooked hardware vulnerabilities can lead to catastrophic breaches. Printers — often ignored in enterprise security protocols — are increasingly becoming attack vectors due to their inherent connectivity and access to sensitive workflows.

From a cybersecurity perspective, CVE-2024-51978 is particularly dangerous not only because it’s unpatchable, but also because it enables predictable exploitation at scale. In simpler terms: a malicious actor could compile a database of serial numbers (e.g., from customer support leaks or physical access) and begin cracking into networks worldwide with minimal effort.

What makes it even more troubling is how avoidable this was. Using hardcoded or algorithm-generated passwords that follow a known pattern is a known anti-pattern in cybersecurity. It’s the kind of lazy engineering decision that may have seemed convenient during production but now poses an irreversible risk to customers.

This also puts Brother in a reputational crisis. Not only must they now overhaul their manufacturing process to include randomized credentials, but they must also regain the trust of IT departments and personal users alike. The fact that this password flaw cannot be fixed retroactively significantly undermines confidence in their hardware lifecycle security planning.

For users, the immediate damage control step is simple but critical: change your admin password right now. Ideally, the password should follow 2025 security best practices — long, random, and stored in a trusted password manager.

From a policy lens, this event might push regulators to enforce secure-by-default manufacturing standards for IoT and connected hardware. As devices become smarter and more integrated, security must be embedded at the factory level, not added as an afterthought.

Brother is not alone in this oversight — the vulnerabilities also affect established brands like Fujifilm and Ricoh. This raises questions about industry-wide quality control, particularly in embedded firmware and credential management.

Moving forward, the printer industry needs a wake-up call: any device with Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or USB connectivity is part of the attack surface. Treating it otherwise is negligence.

🔍 Fact Checker Results:

✅ The vulnerability CVE-2024-51978 is confirmed unpatchable on existing devices per Rapid7’s disclosure.
✅ Brother’s password-generation algorithm is publicly acknowledged as reversible.
✅ Firmware patches are available for the other seven flaws but not for the critical CVE-2024-51978.

📊 Prediction:

With growing media attention and regulatory pressure, Brother and similar vendors will be forced to adopt randomized default credentials by Q4 2025.
Expect corporate IT policies to include printers in regular security audits, particularly for admin password checks.
Manufacturers may face legal consequences or class-action suits if users suffer data breaches tied to this flaw.

References:

Reported By: www.zdnet.com
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit
Wikipedia
OpenAi & Undercode AI

Image Source:

Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2

🔐JOIN OUR CYBER WORLD [ CVE News • HackMonitor • UndercodeNews ]

💬 Whatsapp | 💬 Telegram

📢 Follow UndercodeNews & Stay Tuned:

𝕏 formerly Twitter 🐦 | @ Threads | 🔗 Linkedin