Listen to this Post
Microsoft’s latest Outlook app was initially presented as an optional upgrade, allowing users to switch back to the classic version if they preferred. However, this transition has now become permanent—and not without issues. A critical problem has emerged: the button meant to take users back to classic Outlook no longer functions properly.
On March 12, 2025, Microsoft officially acknowledged this issue and created a support page to address it. But rather than providing a straightforward fix, users are left frustrated as the button fails to perform its intended function. This, combined with other recurring problems, has sparked dissatisfaction among users who were already skeptical about the app’s redesign.
Broken Redirect and Frustrated Users
The “Go to Classic Outlook” button is supposed to guide users to a page where they can download the older version of the app. However, instead of doing so, clicking the button simply closes Outlook without any warning or redirect.
Windows Latest tested this issue on a PC running Windows 24H2 and found that, after clicking the button, a feedback form appeared requesting details about the update. Upon skipping the feedback, nothing happened—the app just shut down, leaving users stranded.
Ideally, Microsoft should have provided a direct redirect to the Microsoft Store or a webpage with download links for classic Outlook. While users can still manually search for the app in the store or use official direct download links, the inconvenience is unnecessary.
The New Outlook’s Unpopularity and Other Issues
Microsoft began preinstalling the new Outlook app on Windows 10 and 11, replacing the Mail and Calendar apps. While the ability to switch back was a good decision, breaking such a simple feature like a redirect button is a frustrating oversight.
Even if the button is eventually fixed, the feedback form itself is an unnecessary step. Instead of guiding users directly to what they need, Microsoft adds a layer of friction, seemingly to discourage switching back.
Beyond the broken switch, the new Outlook app has faced widespread criticism. Users report persistent synchronization issues, a clunky user interface, and a general lack of polish. Many argue that the web version looks and functions better than the standalone app.
The inclusion of advertisements within the email list has only made matters worse. Microsoft cleverly places ads between emails from different senders, blending them in with real messages in a way that feels intrusive.
While some missing features are reportedly in development, the app’s core usability remains a bigger concern. Users expect an intuitive and seamless experience, but instead, they encounter broken UI elements, poorly placed options, and unnecessary design decisions.
For example, the “Go to Classic Outlook” button is currently hidden under the Help menu. A more logical placement—such as in the top bar—would make it easier to access. These small but crucial oversights contribute to the growing frustration surrounding the new Outlook experience.
What Undercode Says:
The rollout of the new Outlook is a textbook example of how not to force an upgrade on users. Here are the key takeaways from this situation:
1. Microsoft’s Aggressive Push
Microsoft’s strategy of making the new Outlook a mandatory upgrade, despite user complaints, feels forceful. The inability to return to classic Outlook seamlessly suggests a deliberate effort to trap users in the new ecosystem.
2. User Frustration is Inevitable
Broken features, unnecessary steps, and a lack of responsiveness make for a frustrating experience. Instead of focusing on improvements, Microsoft seems more interested in controlling user choices.
3. Web App vs. Dedicated App
The new Outlook functions more like a Progressive Web App (PWA) rather than a fully-fledged desktop client. Ironically, many users find the web version superior in performance and design. If the web-based Outlook is better, why force a weaker version as a mandatory upgrade?
4. Ads in Emails? A Terrible Choice
Including advertisements directly in the inbox is one of Microsoft’s most criticized moves. Ads disguised as emails disrupt workflow and feel like a direct monetization attempt at the user’s expense.
5. Lack of Meaningful UI Enhancements
Rather than offering a fresh and improved experience, the new Outlook is riddled with clunky design choices. The hidden “Go to Classic Outlook” button and inefficient navigation make the app feel unfinished.
6. Microsoft’s Slow Response to Feedback
Microsoft has acknowledged the broken button issue, but fixing it should have been a priority from the start. The company’s slow response to valid concerns only deepens user dissatisfaction.
7. The Risk of Losing Users
Forcing an unpopular product upon users without meaningful improvements is risky. If Outlook continues to degrade in quality, users may seek alternatives like Thunderbird, eM Client, or simply switch to the web version.
- Is This a Sign of Things to Come?
Microsoft’s history of aggressive updates (like Windows 11’s forced UI changes) suggests that this may not be an isolated case. If Outlook is being handled this way, could other Microsoft apps suffer the same fate in future updates?
The overall sentiment is clear: Microsoft needs to listen to user feedback, prioritize usability, and avoid turning essential apps into ad-filled, broken experiences. Otherwise, they risk alienating a significant portion of their user base.
Fact Checker Results:
✅ Microsoft has officially acknowledged the broken “Go to Classic Outlook” button issue on March 12, 2025.
✅ Users have reported that the new Outlook app is less functional than the web version and contains intrusive ads.
✅ The feedback form before switching to classic Outlook adds an unnecessary step, frustrating users further.
References:
Reported By: https://www.windowslatest.com/2025/03/15/microsoft-accidentally-breaks-toggle-to-replace-new-outlook-on-windows-11/
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit
Wikipedia
Undercode AI
Image Source:
Pexels
Undercode AI DI v2
