Listen to this Post
A New Chapter for AI Infrastructure in the Desert
Building massive AI data centers in water-stressed regions creates an uncomfortable question: How can the technology powering the next generation of artificial intelligence grow without placing additional pressure on the communities and ecosystems around it?
Oracle is attempting to answer that question through Project Jupiter in southern New Mexico.
On August 11, 2026, Oracle announced a new partnership with agricultural technology company Arable designed to conserve approximately 21 million gallons of water every year in the Rio Grande–Bravo watershed. According to Oracle, that amount is more than 20 times the water required to operate Project Jupiter’s cooling and power systems and exceeds the campus’s combined potable and non-potable water consumption at peak employment.
The strategy is significant because Project Jupiter is being developed in Doña Ana County, a region where water is not simply an industrial resource. It is essential to agriculture, households, ecosystems, and the long-term economic future of southern New Mexico.
Oracle says the new initiative will combine agricultural sensors, real-time environmental information, farmer training, and independent measurement to reduce unnecessary irrigation while keeping farms productive.
The announcement represents another step in Oracle’s broader effort to portray Project Jupiter as an example of a different model for AI infrastructure—one in which the company attempts to compensate for its resource consumption by investing in conservation beyond the data center itself.
Project Jupiter’s Water Challenge Is Larger Than the Data Center
The debate surrounding AI infrastructure has increasingly moved beyond electricity and computing power.
Water has become one of the
Data centers can require water for cooling, electricity generation can have water requirements of its own, and large technology campuses can place additional demands on local infrastructure. These concerns become even more important when facilities are constructed in arid parts of the United States.
Project Jupiter is therefore being watched closely because it is being developed in southern New Mexico, where water availability is already a major regional concern.
Oracle has emphasized that its Project Jupiter cooling system will not use the local public drinking-water supply and will not require new wells for cooling. Instead, the company says its cooling and microgrid water supply is separate from water delivered to local homes and businesses.
Oracle
The company has also changed the
Oracle
That makes the new conservation partnership particularly important.
Oracle and Arable Want Farmers to Use Data Instead of Guesswork
At the heart of the new initiative is a surprisingly simple concept: give farmers better information about exactly when crops need water.
Arable specializes in agricultural technology that collects environmental and crop information directly from fields.
Its sensors can monitor conditions such as weather and crop water requirements, allowing growers to make irrigation decisions based on current field conditions rather than relying exclusively on fixed schedules.
That distinction can make a substantial difference.
A traditional irrigation schedule might tell a farmer to irrigate a field on a particular day because that is what has historically worked. But weather changes. Temperatures fluctuate. Rainfall arrives unexpectedly. Soil conditions evolve. Crops at different stages of growth can have very different water requirements.
Real-time data allows irrigation decisions to become more precise.
Instead of asking, “Is today the day we normally irrigate?”, growers can ask a much more useful question:
“Does this field actually need water right now?”
21 Million Gallons a Year Is the Number Everyone Will Watch
Oracle estimates that the program will conserve approximately 21 million gallons of water annually.
The company says that figure is more than 20 times the water required to run Project Jupiter’s cooling and power systems.
If the savings estimate is achieved consistently, the initiative would represent an important shift in how large technology companies approach environmental mitigation.
Rather than focusing exclusively on reducing water consumption inside the facility, Oracle is funding conservation where water is already heavily used: agriculture.
That approach makes sense from a resource-management perspective because agricultural irrigation represents a much larger and more complex water-management environment than a single industrial facility.
But it also creates an important requirement.
The savings must be measurable.
A large number in a press release is not enough.
The real test will be whether independent measurement demonstrates that the water would otherwise have been consumed and that the intervention genuinely produced additional savings.
Oracle says it understands that requirement.
Independent Verification Could Become the Most Important Part
Oracle says an independent third-party assessor will validate the project’s water savings using a recognized methodology for measuring and verifying conservation projects.
The company also says it will publish the resulting validation reports.
That commitment could become one of the most valuable elements of the initiative.
Water conservation claims are difficult to evaluate because saving water is not always as simple as comparing two numbers.
For example, if a farm uses less water this year, several factors could be responsible:
More rainfall
Lower temperatures
Changes in crop type
Reduced acreage
Changes in farming practices
Improved irrigation technology
Sensor-guided irrigation
Different groundwater conditions
Regulatory restrictions
A credible measurement system has to separate the impact of the project from changes that would have happened anyway.
That is why independent verification matters.
If the published reports demonstrate measurable and repeatable savings, Project Jupiter could offer a model that other data center developers might attempt to replicate.
The Rio Grande–Bravo Watershed Makes the Location Especially Important
The program will operate within the Rio Grande–Bravo watershed, the same broader watershed serving Project Jupiter.
That geographic connection matters.
A water conservation program is much more meaningful when it benefits the same watershed affected by the facility’s operations.
Instead of conserving water thousands of miles away and using the savings as an accounting offset, Oracle is targeting the regional water system directly connected to Project Jupiter.
This creates a clearer relationship between the
It also makes the results easier for local stakeholders to understand.
Agriculture Is Where Technology Could Make a Major Difference
Agriculture has always depended on information.
Farmers have historically used experience, weather observations, soil knowledge, irrigation schedules, and increasingly sophisticated forecasting tools to determine when and how much to irrigate.
The next stage is increasingly data-driven agriculture.
Sensors can continuously observe field conditions.
Machine-learning systems can process weather patterns.
Advanced models can estimate crop water demand.
Connected irrigation systems can potentially respond more precisely.
And farmers can combine those recommendations with something technology cannot easily replace: decades of practical knowledge about their own land.
That combination is arguably more powerful than automation alone.
Arable’s role in the Project Jupiter program is therefore not simply to install sensors.
The company says agricultural specialists and its agronomy team will provide hands-on training and ongoing support so growers can actually incorporate the information into their irrigation decisions.
That human component could determine whether the project succeeds beyond its initial deployment.
Farmers Still Make the Final Decisions
One of the strongest aspects of the initiative is that the technology is designed to support growers rather than replace them.
Farmers know their fields.
They understand crop behavior, soil conditions, irrigation infrastructure, local weather patterns, and practical constraints that an algorithm might not fully capture.
Real-time sensor data becomes useful when it complements that experience.
The goal is not to tell a farmer that a computer knows their field better.
The goal is to give that farmer more information.
That distinction is important because sustainability programs tend to work better when the people directly affected by them have an active role in implementation.
Oracle’s $50 Million Water Infrastructure Commitment
The Arable partnership is not Project
Oracle has also committed $50 million to improve local water and wastewater infrastructure in Doña Ana County.
Oracle’s July 2026 update said 80% of that commitment had already been funded, with the remaining funding expected the following month. The same update said Project Jupiter had generated nearly $80 million in state and county tax revenue and was on track to create more than 7,000 construction jobs and 1,500 ongoing project-supported jobs.
Oracle
This broader infrastructure investment is important because the sustainability question surrounding a large data center is not limited to what happens inside the facility.
Infrastructure matters.
Pipes matter.
Wastewater treatment matters.
Water availability matters.
And community resilience matters.
A company can build an efficient data center while still contributing to pressure on surrounding infrastructure if those systems are not strengthened alongside the development.
Project Jupiter Wants to Redefine the Data Center Footprint
Oracle is presenting Project Jupiter as something more ambitious than another computing facility.
The project is being positioned as a large-scale AI infrastructure campus with an economic footprint extending into employment, taxation, energy infrastructure, water infrastructure, and agricultural conservation.
Oracle estimates the project could deliver more than $4.7 billion in long-term economic impact to New Mexico and the surrounding county through tax revenue, investment, and additional commercial activity.
Oracle
That economic argument is central to
The company wants the community to see Project Jupiter not merely as a consumer of resources but as an economic engine capable of funding improvements that benefit the region.
Whether that argument ultimately convinces every resident is another question.
Water Positive Is Not the Same as Water Neutral
There is an important conceptual distinction behind
A company can attempt to be water neutral, meaning it offsets roughly the amount of water it consumes.
Oracle is pursuing something more ambitious with this initiative: conserving more water than Project Jupiter itself uses.
If the 21-million-gallon annual conservation figure is independently validated, the project would theoretically create a substantial conservation surplus relative to the campus’s operational water requirements.
That is the essence of the
But the credibility of such a strategy depends entirely on measurement.
The stronger the verification process, the stronger the claim.
The Biggest Question Is Additionality
There is one technical concept that deserves much more attention: additionality.
Imagine a farmer would have reduced irrigation by 10% next year regardless of Oracle’s program because of changing weather, rising costs, or new agricultural practices.
If the project claims that entire reduction as its own water saving, the number becomes misleading.
A rigorous program needs to determine how much water was actually saved because of the intervention.
That requires establishing an appropriate baseline.
It may involve historical irrigation data, crop characteristics, weather records, field-level measurements, and comparisons against control conditions.
The better the methodology, the more meaningful the 21-million-gallon figure becomes.
Why Transparency Could Make or Break the Program
Oracle’s promise to publish validation reports is therefore more important than the headline number.
If the company publishes methodology, assumptions, baseline calculations, uncertainty ranges, and independent verification results, outside researchers and local stakeholders can evaluate the program.
That creates accountability.
It also allows other companies to learn from the project.
If the results are strong, the initiative could become a blueprint for other AI campuses operating in water-stressed regions.
If the results are weaker than expected, transparency would still be valuable because it would reveal where the model needs improvement.
Environmental programs should not be judged only by whether they produce impressive headlines.
They should be judged by whether the measurements survive scrutiny.
Deep Analysis: How the Water-Saving System Could Be Audited
The technical side of the project can be understood as a continuous measurement pipeline.
Sensors gather field-level information.
Weather data provides environmental context.
Crop models estimate water requirements.
Irrigation records document actual application.
Analysts compare observed irrigation behavior against an established baseline.
Independent assessors then validate the resulting savings.
A simplified data workflow could look like this:
Inspect incoming field measurements python analyze_sensor_data.py --input field_data.csv
Remove obviously invalid sensor readings
python clean_sensor_data.py \n--input field_data.csv \n--output field_data_clean.csv
Compare irrigation against the established baseline
python calculate_savings.py \n--baseline baseline.csv \n--actual field_data_clean.csv \n--output savings_report.csv
Generate an annual conservation summary
python generate_report.py \n--input savings_report.csv \n--output annual_water_savings.pdf
The commands above are illustrative rather than
A credible monitoring system should preserve raw measurements, record corrections, document missing data, and maintain an auditable history of calculations.
Sensor Data Needs More Than a Dashboard
A modern agricultural sensor can produce enormous quantities of information.
But more data does not automatically mean better decisions.
Sensors must be calibrated.
Devices can fail.
Networks can go offline.
Weather stations can produce anomalous measurements.
Soil conditions can vary dramatically across relatively small areas.
A robust program therefore needs quality-control procedures before data becomes part of a water-savings calculation.
A basic validation process might include:
Detect missing values python validate.py --check-missing field_data.csv
Identify abnormal measurements
python validate.py --check-outliers field_data.csv
Verify timestamps
python validate.py --check-time field_data.csv
Produce a quality-control log
python validate.py --report field_data.csv
Again, these are conceptual examples.
The broader point is that environmental measurement requires the same discipline expected in cybersecurity, finance, or scientific research.
If the input data is unreliable, the final number is unreliable.
Water Savings Should Be Measured at Field Level
One of the most promising aspects of
Regional averages can hide enormous differences.
Two farms may receive the same amount of rainfall but have different soil types.
Two fields may grow the same crop but have different irrigation systems.
Two sections of the same field can experience different moisture conditions.
Field-level measurement can therefore provide much more useful information than simply calculating regional averages.
That precision is especially valuable in a water-constrained environment.
The AI Connection Is Bigger Than It Looks
Project Jupiter is fundamentally an AI infrastructure project.
Yet its environmental strategy is also increasingly dependent on data and intelligent decision-making.
That creates an interesting feedback loop.
AI requires enormous computing infrastructure.
Computing infrastructure requires energy and resources.
Those resource requirements create environmental challenges.
Technology is then being used to optimize some of those resources.
In agriculture, machine learning and sensor networks can help determine when crops need water.
In data centers, software can optimize cooling.
In energy systems, intelligent forecasting can improve demand management.
The same technological revolution that increases resource demand can also create tools capable of reducing resource waste.
The challenge is ensuring that the savings are real.
Project Jupiter’s Energy Strategy Is Part of the Water Story
Water and energy cannot be treated as completely separate issues.
Electricity generation can have its own water footprint depending on the technology involved.
That is one reason Oracle’s shift toward a fuel-cell microgrid is relevant to the project’s water strategy.
Oracle said the updated energy design would minimize water use compared with the previous plan.
Oracle
This illustrates an important principle in infrastructure planning:
Reducing water consumption sometimes begins by changing the energy system.
The environmental footprint of a data center is interconnected.
Cooling, electricity, wastewater, construction, and supply chains all contribute to the larger picture.
The Economic Argument Is Powerful—but It Needs Balance
Oracle’s economic projections are substantial.
The company expects Project Jupiter to produce billions of dollars in economic impact while creating thousands of jobs during construction and hundreds or thousands of ongoing positions.
The July update also reported that nearly 700 New Mexico residents had already worked onsite and that the project had generated significant tax revenue.
Oracle
Those benefits are meaningful.
But economic benefits should not automatically end the environmental conversation.
The correct question is not:
“Is Project Jupiter economically beneficial?”
It is:
“Can the economic benefits be achieved while keeping environmental and infrastructure costs manageable?”
That is a much harder question.
Community Trust Cannot Be Measured in Gallons
This may ultimately be the most difficult challenge facing Project Jupiter.
A company can measure water.
It can measure electricity.
It can measure jobs.
It can measure tax revenue.
But community trust is harder to quantify.
Recent public discussions around Project Jupiter show that local concerns remain significant, particularly around environmental effects and the project’s development.
+1
That means Oracle’s conservation commitments will be judged not only by technical reports but also by how residents perceive the project’s overall impact.
Transparency can help.
Independent verification can help.
Public reporting can help.
But trust is built over time.
Why the 21 Million Gallon Figure Deserves Scrutiny
The headline number is impressive.
But it should be viewed as a targeted conservation estimate, not as proof that the project has already saved 21 million gallons.
The program still needs to operate.
The growers still need to participate.
The sensors need to function.
The irrigation changes need to happen.
And the savings need to be independently verified.
Only then can the annual figure be judged against real-world performance.
That distinction is essential for responsible reporting.
What Happens If the Program Works?
If the project succeeds, Oracle could demonstrate a model that becomes increasingly relevant across the technology industry.
Future data center developers could identify nearby watersheds.
They could fund agricultural efficiency programs.
They could deploy smart irrigation technologies.
They could invest in wastewater infrastructure.
They could establish independent verification systems.
And instead of simply claiming to reduce resource consumption, they could publish measurable outcomes.
That would be a significant evolution in corporate sustainability.
What Undercode Say:
- The Water Issue Is Becoming an AI Infrastructure Issue
AI’s explosive growth has transformed data centers into infrastructure projects with consequences far beyond computing.
- New Mexico Is an Important Test Case
Project Jupiter is being built in an environment where water availability already carries enormous social and economic importance.
3. Oracle Is Trying a Different Strategy
Instead of focusing exclusively on minimizing water consumption inside the campus, Oracle is investing in conservation elsewhere in the same watershed.
4. That Strategy Makes Conceptual Sense
Water is a shared resource, so improving efficiency throughout the watershed can potentially create greater benefits than optimizing one facility alone.
5. Agriculture Is a Logical Target
Agriculture is deeply connected to water management, making irrigation efficiency an obvious place for conservation technology.
6. But Technology Alone Is Not Enough
Installing sensors does not automatically save water.
The farmer has to use the information.
7. Human Expertise Remains Critical
Local growers understand their fields in ways that automated models cannot completely reproduce.
8. The Best Model Combines Both
Sensor data plus farmer experience could produce better irrigation decisions than either approach alone.
9. Real-Time Information Is Powerful
Weather and crop conditions can change quickly.
Fixed irrigation schedules cannot always react efficiently.
10. Measurement Is the Real Test
The 21-million-gallon estimate needs independent verification.
11. Baselines Matter
Without a credible baseline, it becomes difficult to determine how much water the program actually saved.
12. Additionality Matters Even More
The program should receive credit only for conservation caused by its intervention.
13. Independent Auditing Is Essential
A third-party assessor can provide credibility that a corporate self-reported number cannot provide by itself.
14. Publishing Reports Is a Strong Move
Oracle’s commitment to publish validation results gives researchers and communities an opportunity to examine the claims.
15. Transparency Should Go Further
Ideally, the reports should explain methodologies, assumptions, uncertainties, and limitations.
16. Water Accounting Needs Scientific Discipline
Environmental claims should be measured with the same seriousness as financial reporting.
- Data Quality Can Become a Hidden Problem
Bad sensors can produce bad conclusions.
18. Calibration Is Not Optional
Agricultural monitoring systems need reliable and regularly checked instrumentation.
19. Missing Data Must Be Documented
Silently ignoring missing measurements can distort conservation estimates.
20. Extreme Weather Must Be Considered
A naturally wet year could make water savings appear larger than they actually are.
21. Crop Changes Can Also Distort Results
Different crops can require dramatically different quantities of water.
22. Irrigation Technology Changes Matter
A farmer upgrading equipment independently could reduce consumption even without Oracle’s program.
23. This Is Why Experimental Design Matters
The project needs a methodology capable of separating program effects from unrelated changes.
24. The Same Principle Applies to AI
AI systems are increasingly being used to optimize physical infrastructure.
25. AI Can Increase Resource Demand
Training and operating large models requires enormous computing capacity.
26. AI Can Also Reduce Waste
The same technology can improve forecasting, automation, logistics, agriculture, and energy efficiency.
27. That Creates an Interesting Contradiction
AI could become both a major consumer of resources and a tool for managing them more intelligently.
- Project Jupiter Sits Directly Inside That Contradiction
The facility requires resources while its surrounding conservation strategy attempts to reduce the broader impact.
29. Water and Energy Are Connected
Changing how electricity is generated can also affect water consumption.
30.
The
Oracle
31. Infrastructure Investment Matters Too
Oracle’s $50 million commitment to local water and wastewater systems expands the project’s environmental strategy beyond conservation credits.
32. Economic Benefits Are Another Piece
Oracle expects Project Jupiter to generate more than $4.7 billion in long-term economic impact.
Oracle
33. Jobs Can Strengthen the Local Argument
Thousands of construction jobs and ongoing positions could provide meaningful economic benefits.
34. But Economics Cannot Replace Environmental Accountability
A profitable project can still create environmental pressure.
- Environmental Benefits Cannot Replace Community Dialogue Either
Residents need transparent information about both benefits and risks.
36. Trust Is Built Through Evidence
Published measurements are more persuasive than promotional language.
37. Project Jupiter Could Become a Blueprint
If independently verified results are strong, other data center developers could replicate the model.
- Failure Would Also Teach the Industry Something
If projected savings fall short, transparent reporting could reveal what needs to change.
- The Most Important Number Is Not 21 Million
The most important number will ultimately be the independently verified amount of additional water conserved.
- The Bigger Test Is Whether Growth Can Become Responsible
Project Jupiter represents a broader question facing the technology industry: Can AI infrastructure expand rapidly without forcing local communities to absorb an unfair share of its environmental costs?
✅ Oracle Has Announced a Major Water-Conservation Initiative
The supplied article’s central claim is consistent with Oracle’s broader public Project Jupiter strategy and the company’s documented emphasis on minimizing water use and supporting local water infrastructure. Oracle has previously stated that Project Jupiter will not use the community’s public drinking-water supply for cooling and will not drill new wells for that purpose.
Oracle
✅ The $50 Million Water Infrastructure Commitment Is Supported
Oracle has publicly documented its $50 million commitment to improve local water infrastructure in Doña Ana County, and its July update said 80% of that commitment had already been funded.
Oracle
✅ The $4.7 Billion Economic Impact and Job Figures Are Supported
Oracle’s July 2026 announcement independently confirms the expectation of more than $4.7 billion in long-term economic impact, more than 7,000 construction jobs, and approximately 1,500 ongoing project-supported jobs.
Oracle
⚠️ The 21 Million Gallon Figure Should Be Treated as a Projected Conservation Result
The figure represents
⚠️ “Water Positive” Requires Careful Interpretation
Conserving more water than a facility consumes can be a meaningful sustainability strategy, but the accounting depends on baselines, additionality, measurement methodology, and watershed conditions. The final validated reports will therefore matter more than the initial projection.
Deep Analysis: Why This Could Change Data Center Sustainability
The Data Center Industry Is Entering a New Resource Era
For years, conversations about data centers focused primarily on electricity, processors, cooling equipment, and network capacity.
That is changing.
As AI workloads grow, developers increasingly have to answer questions about water, land, electricity generation, grid infrastructure, emissions, and local economic impact.
Project Jupiter reflects this transition.
The modern data center is no longer simply an industrial building filled with servers.
It is becoming part of the infrastructure of an entire region.
Water Efficiency Could Become a Competitive Requirement
As communities become more conscious of water consumption, technology companies may increasingly compete on environmental efficiency.
A future data center proposal may need to demonstrate:
How much water it consumes.
Where the water comes from.
Whether it uses potable water.
How cooling works.
What happens to wastewater.
How water use changes during peak operations.
What conservation projects accompany development.
How those savings are independently verified.
Project Jupiter is already moving in that direction.
The “Local Offset” Model Is Particularly Interesting
There is a major difference between purchasing a generic environmental credit and investing directly in the watershed affected by a facility.
A local conservation project can potentially create multiple benefits simultaneously.
Farmers may reduce irrigation.
Infrastructure may improve.
Water may remain available for other users.
Agricultural productivity may be protected.
The watershed may become more resilient.
That makes local conservation potentially more tangible than distant offsetting.
But Local Offsets Need Strong Governance
The danger is that local conservation could become another form of accounting theater if the numbers are not independently verified.
That is why
The strongest version of this model would involve:
Measured consumption → documented baseline → intervention → measured outcome → independent verification → public report.
That is the chain that can transform a sustainability claim into an auditable environmental result.
The Bigger Story Is Resource Efficiency
The Project Jupiter announcement is ultimately not just about water.
It is about whether technological infrastructure can become more efficient as it becomes larger.
That is a critical question for the AI era.
The
If every additional AI facility simply consumes more electricity, more water, more land, and more infrastructure without compensation, communities will eventually push back.
If new facilities instead become progressively more efficient and contribute to local infrastructure improvements, the relationship could become more sustainable.
Oracle Is Testing That Second Model
Project Jupiter is effectively becoming a case study.
Oracle is combining:
Data center efficiency
with
water infrastructure investment
with
agricultural conservation
with
independent measurement
with
local economic development.
The model is ambitious.
Its success will depend on execution.
Prediction
(+1) Water-Positive Data Centers Will Become More Common
The pressure surrounding AI infrastructure is unlikely to disappear. As data centers expand into regions where water is scarce, developers will increasingly need to demonstrate that they understand and mitigate their local environmental footprint.
If Project
The next generation of data center development may therefore move beyond simply asking:
“How much water does this facility use?”
The more important question could become:
“What measurable improvement does this facility create for the watershed around it?”
That would represent a meaningful change in the way technology infrastructure is designed, evaluated, and regulated.
The Bigger Picture: AI Growth Meets the Reality of the Desert
A Technology Story With a Human Consequence
Behind every AI model is physical infrastructure.
Behind every physical infrastructure project is a community.
And behind every community is a finite supply of resources.
Project
That means the technology industry will increasingly be judged not only by the intelligence of its models, the speed of its processors, or the scale of its data centers, but by how responsibly those systems interact with the communities and environments that make them possible.
If Oracle can prove that Project Jupiter consumes relatively little water while helping conserve substantially more through measurable agricultural efficiency, the project could become an important example of how AI infrastructure can coexist with regional resource constraints.
But the proof will not come from a press release.
It will come from the fields.
It will come from the sensors.
It will come from the farmers.
It will come from the independent auditors.
And ultimately, it will come from the numbers.
▶️ Related Video (74% Match):
🕵️📝Let’s dive deep and fact‑check.
🎓 Live Courses & Certifications:
Join Undercode Academy for Verified Certifications
🚀 Request a Custom Project:
Secure, high-velocity infrastructure and disruptive technological engineering. Contact our engineering team for high-tier development and proprietary systems:
[email protected]
💎 Smart Architecture | 🛡️ Secure by Design | ⭐ Trusted by Thousands
References:
Reported By: oracle.com
Extra Source Hub (Possible Sources for article):
https://www.instagram.com
Wikipedia
OpenAi & Undercode AI
Image Source:
Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
🔐JOIN OUR CYBER WORLD [ CVE News • HackMonitor • UndercodeNews ]
📢 Follow UndercodeNews & Stay Tuned:
𝕏 formerly Twitter 🐦 | @ Threads | 🔗 Linkedin | 🦋BlueSky | 🐘Mastodon | 📺Youtube
