Listen to this Post
Introduction
In a bold and unexpected prediction, Roelof Botha — a heavyweight investor at Sequoia Capital — argued that SpaceX may one day eclipse OpenAI in value, solidifying itself not just as an aerospace leader, but as a dominant force in the tech universe. Speaking at Axios’ BFD event, Botha laid out why he believes Elon Musk’s rocket company is uniquely positioned to become the most valuable private company in the world — and why, despite the current AI boom, SpaceX might be the better long-term bet.
Summary of the Original
Roelof Botha, a senior figure at Sequoia Capital, told Axios that SpaceX has a stronger shot than OpenAI to become the most valuable company in tech. He highlighted that last year, SpaceX was responsible for launching 80% of all mass into orbit, underlining its overwhelming dominance in aerospace. Botha emphasized that Elon Musk’s firm grip and leadership style help the company adapt quickly to industry shifts.
He also admitted that he misjudged the regulatory landscape: he had expected fewer merger-and-acquisition hurdles after Trump’s re-election in 2024, but was proven wrong. Notably, Botha recently stepped down as Sequoia’s senior steward — a role he’d held since 2017, taking the lead solo starting in 2022.
Meanwhile, OpenAI continues its meteoric rise, with recent secondary share sales giving it a valuation of $500 billion, putting it ahead of SpaceX’s estimated $400 billion value.
Yahoo Finance
+2
Business Standard
+2
Botha’s assessment is especially striking given the common narrative: that AI companies like OpenAI represent the future’s highest-value bets. Instead, he argues that SpaceX’s scale, mission, and foundational role in space infrastructure may give it even greater upside.
What Undercode Say:
Botha’s perspective offers a contrarian but deeply strategic take on where the real value lies in technology’s next frontier. Here’s why his bet on SpaceX deserves serious consideration — and the risks that come with it.
Dominance in Physical Infrastructure Is Rare
Unlike AI, which can scale virtually, space launches require physical infrastructure: rockets, launchpads, satellites. SpaceX’s track record of reliably delivering payload to orbit (80% of total mass, per Botha) gives it a tangible moat.
This material dominance is harder for competitors to replicate. The barrier to entry is steep: building rockets, reusability, and navigation systems takes time, capital, and proven engineering.
Long-Term Vision vs. Short-Term Hype
OpenAI’s $500 billion valuation is, to a large extent, driven by investor excitement around AI’s transformative potential. But hype can swing. AI progress is not guaranteed to deliver at the pace or scale the market expects.
In contrast, SpaceX’s ambition is baked into its multi-decade mission: colonizing Mars, building Starship, and providing global internet via Starlink. These are bets that transcend quarterly earnings.
Synergy with other Musk Ventures
SpaceX doesn’t operate in a vacuum. It intersects with other Musk companies, like Tesla (for power systems) and xAI (for intelligent satellite systems), potentially compounding value.
Musk’s leadership style — risk-taking, long time horizons, integration across his ventures — is its own competitive advantage.
Regulatory and Capital Risk Still Loom
Botha admitted he misread the post-election regulatory landscape. M&A remains unpredictable, and national security concerns (especially in space) could tighten oversight.
Building rockets is capital-intensive. While SpaceX has proven it can raise money, future scale (e.g., building Starship at scale or mass-producing Starlink satellites) demands even more capital — and execution discipline.
AI Is Not Dead, But It’s Not Everything
AI is clearly transformative, and OpenAI is riding that wave. But Botha seems to be suggesting that technological value isn’t just about bits and algorithms — hardware, infrastructure, and physical scale matter too.
If SpaceX plays its cards right, it could become not just a “space company,” but a platform company: satellite communications, space logistics, in-orbit manufacturing, and more.
Investor Sentiment Could Shift
If investors start believing Botha’s thesis — that space is the next infrastructure boom — capital could flow away from pure-play AI and back into aerospace.
That said, sentiment can be fickle. The AI industry still has momentum, and valuations can swing dramatically if growth slows or costs balloon.
Sustainability of Business Models
SpaceX already has multiple revenue streams: launch services, Starlink subscriptions, government contracts. This diversification is healthier than a mono-focus.
OpenAI, while diversified in AI applications, still relies heavily on capital-intensive compute infrastructure, and profit models aren’t yet fully proven.
Bottom line: Botha isn’t just making a flashy bet — he’s framing a strategic narrative that tangible infrastructure might ultimately outpace speculative AI hype. For long-term investors, SpaceX could represent a deeper, more resilient value play.
Fact Checker Results:
✅ SpaceX moved 80% of mass into orbit last year — confirmed by Botha in the Axios interview.
Axios
✅ OpenAI’s valuation reached $500 billion — based on a $6.6 billion share sale to major investors.
Yahoo Finance
+2
News9live
+2
❌ Sequoia’s Roelof Botha still leads Sequoia as senior steward — false: he stepped down recently, according to the report.
Axios
Prediction:
Looking ahead, SpaceX could emerge as the defining infrastructure company of the 21st century. If Botha’s vision proves correct:
SpaceX’s value may outpace AI firms in the long run, especially if it monetizes Starlink, Starship, and space-based services.
Institutional investors might increasingly view space as the next frontier for long-duration capital, leading to a reallocation of funds from speculative tech toward physical infrastructure.
As SpaceX scales, it could spin off or partner with other Musk ventures — AI, robotics, satellite manufacturing — turning it into a vertically integrated tech-physical powerhouse.
Regulatory and technological risk remain very real, but if SpaceX navigates them, it could not only compete with AI companies on valuation but redefine what a “tech company” means.
In sum, Botha’s prediction isn’t just provocative — it might be prophetic.
Axios
Exclusive: SpaceX could be more valuable than OpenAI,
Today
ft.com
OpenAI overtakes SpaceX after hitting $500bn valuation
Oct 2, 2025
businessinsider.com
Sequoia partner says there’s too much venture capital and not enough companies to invest in: ‘It’s a return-free risk’
Oct 16, 2025
🕵️📝✔️Let’s dive deep and fact‑check.
References:
Reported By: axioscom_1763509135
Extra Source Hub (Possible Sources for article):
https://www.instagram.com
Wikipedia
OpenAi & Undercode AI
Image Source:
Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
Bing
🔐JOIN OUR CYBER WORLD [ CVE News • HackMonitor • UndercodeNews ]
📢 Follow UndercodeNews & Stay Tuned:
𝕏 formerly Twitter 🐦 | @ Threads | 🔗 Linkedin | 🦋BlueSky | 🐘Mastodon
