Listen to this Post
Introduction: When the Watchdogs Become the Targets
The global spyware industry has repeatedly demonstrated that no individual is truly beyond its reach. Journalists, activists, lawyers, political opponents, and government officials have all found themselves under digital surveillance. Yet one of the most shocking developments in recent years has emerged from the heart of European democracy itself. A member of the very parliamentary committee created to investigate spyware abuses was secretly infected with one of the world’s most infamous surveillance tools.
The revelation is more than an embarrassing security failure. It raises disturbing questions about political espionage, parliamentary independence, digital sovereignty, and whether democratic institutions are equipped to defend themselves against sophisticated cyber surveillance. If investigators examining spyware can themselves become victims, what does that say about the state of digital security across Europe?
Summary: Pegasus Reaches the Heart of Its Own Investigation
A newly published investigation by Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto has confirmed that Greek journalist and former Member of the European Parliament Stelios Kouloglou was infected twice with Pegasus spyware while serving as a substitute member of the European Parliament’s PEGA Committee.
The committee had been established after widespread revelations that governments across Europe had allegedly abused commercial spyware, particularly Pegasus, developed by Israel-based NSO Group.
Citizen Lab determined with high confidence that Kouloglou’s phone was compromised around October 2022 and again in March 2023, both periods coinciding with some of the committee’s most sensitive discussions and report drafting sessions.
Ironically, the committee tasked with exposing spyware abuse appears to have been infiltrated by the very technology it was investigating.
Citizen
According to Citizen Lab’s forensic analysis, Pegasus successfully infected Kouloglou’s mobile device during two separate periods.
The first compromise occurred while the committee was preparing major hearings and drafting its initial findings. During this period, Kouloglou was hospitalized and met with another Greek journalist who had previously been targeted with spyware.
Because Pegasus can secretly activate microphones and capture conversations, investigators note that confidential discussions inside a hospital room may have been monitored, raising additional concerns regarding medical privacy and protected personal data.
The second infection happened months later as the committee finalized its recommendations and entered intense negotiations surrounding its final report.
The timing strongly suggests that whoever deployed Pegasus was interested not in Kouloglou personally, but in gaining privileged access to confidential parliamentary discussions.
An Investigation Meant to Protect Democracy Became Its Own Victim
The PEGA Committee was created after explosive reports revealed widespread deployment of Pegasus across several European countries.
Its mission was straightforward: investigate abuses, identify regulatory failures, and recommend stronger safeguards against commercial spyware.
Committee members expected resistance.
Some even anticipated hacking attempts.
What they did not expect was that one of their own would later be confirmed as an actual Pegasus victim.
That confirmation transforms theoretical concerns into documented evidence that even democratic oversight bodies remain vulnerable to sophisticated cyber surveillance.
The Mystery Behind the Attack Remains Unsolved
Despite confirming the spyware infections, Citizen Lab could not identify who deployed Pegasus against Kouloglou.
Several possibilities remain.
It could have been a government agency.
It could have involved intelligence services.
It may even have originated from another actor with access to Pegasus capabilities.
Without definitive attribution, investigators are left examining motive rather than identity.
Most experts believe the objective was likely access to confidential parliamentary discussions, internal reports, witness preparations, and sensitive communications regarding the committee’s investigation.
Pegasus Continues to Challenge Global Accountability
Pegasus remains one of the most advanced commercial spyware platforms ever developed.
Once installed, it can quietly collect messages, emails, contacts, photographs, passwords, encrypted chats, location information, microphone recordings, and camera feeds without alerting the victim.
Numerous investigations over recent years have linked Pegasus to surveillance campaigns targeting journalists, lawyers, activists, politicians, diplomats, opposition figures, and civil society organizations across multiple countries.
Although NSO Group insists its software is intended solely for fighting terrorism and organized crime, repeated investigations have documented alleged misuse against individuals unrelated to criminal activity.
This latest discovery adds yet another politically significant case to the growing list.
European Parliament Faces Difficult Questions
Hannah Neumann, another PEGA Committee member, admitted that many lawmakers expected surveillance attempts.
The committee had even coordinated with the European Parliament’s internal cybersecurity teams to improve protections and conduct regular spyware scans.
Yet those measures failed to prevent Pegasus from successfully infiltrating a committee member’s device.
This raises uncomfortable questions.
Were existing security procedures insufficient?
Did attackers exploit previously unknown vulnerabilities?
Or are commercial spyware platforms simply advancing faster than institutional defenses?
Each possibility exposes weaknesses in
Legal Action Against NSO Group May Follow
Following Citizen
Previous lawsuits involving Pegasus victims have produced mixed outcomes.
Some cases continue through lengthy legal battles, while others have struggled due to jurisdictional complexity, government secrecy, and difficulties obtaining evidence regarding spyware deployment.
Regardless of the legal outcome, another lawsuit would increase pressure on both spyware vendors and governments to improve transparency regarding surveillance technology.
Spyware Has Become a Threat to Democratic Institutions
Perhaps the most troubling aspect of this case is its broader implication.
If parliamentary investigators themselves cannot protect confidential communications, democratic oversight mechanisms become increasingly vulnerable.
Surveillance no longer targets only individuals.
It can undermine investigations, influence policymaking, expose confidential witnesses, compromise legislative discussions, and weaken institutional independence.
The attack therefore represents more than a cybersecurity incident.
It represents a potential attack against democratic accountability itself.
The PEGA
Years after completing its work, many of the PEGA Committee’s recommendations remain unimplemented.
Members now argue that this latest infection demonstrates exactly why stronger regulation cannot remain delayed.
Calls include stricter oversight of commercial spyware vendors, improved protections for elected officials, mandatory device inspections, independent forensic investigations, greater transparency surrounding government spyware procurement, and stronger legal safeguards for surveillance victims.
Without implementation, lawmakers fear similar attacks will continue across Europe.
Deep Analysis: Technical Lessons and Defensive Commands
The Pegasus case illustrates that defending against advanced spyware requires continuous monitoring rather than assuming devices remain permanently secure.
Linux administrators and security researchers can strengthen investigative environments using commands such as:
uname -a hostnamectl lsb_release -a whoami id sudo journalctl -xe journalctl --since today sudo dmesg last lastlog w ss -tulpn netstat -plant lsof -i ps aux pstree top htop sudo systemctl list-units --type=service systemctl --failed sudo find /tmp -type f find ~ -name ".sh" find / -perm -4000 2>/dev/null crontab -l sudo crontab -l systemctl list-timers sudo ausearch -m AVC sudo auditctl -l sudo grep "Accepted" /var/log/auth.log sudo grep "Failed" /var/log/auth.log sudo tcpdump -i any sudo wireshark nmap localhost sudo chkrootkit sudo rkhunter --check sudo lynis audit system sha256sum suspicious_file file suspicious_file strings suspicious_file readelf -a suspicious_file objdump -d suspicious_file sudo freshclam clamscan -r /
While Pegasus itself typically exploits mobile operating systems rather than Linux desktops, these commands demonstrate the mindset required for proactive security auditing. Continuous monitoring, log analysis, forensic readiness, and integrity verification remain essential principles across every computing platform.
What Undercode Say:
The Kouloglou case is significant because it removes any remaining illusion that parliamentary status offers protection from commercial cyber espionage. The attackers demonstrated confidence, patience, and precise timing.
The infections were not random.
They coincided with moments when confidential legislative work carried maximum intelligence value.
That alone reveals a sophisticated operational objective.
Commercial spyware has evolved into an international geopolitical instrument.
Unlike traditional malware designed for financial theft, Pegasus focuses on information dominance.
Knowledge is power.
Access to confidential negotiations can influence diplomacy, legislation, regulatory decisions, and international relations without firing a single shot.
Europe now faces a strategic challenge.
Cybersecurity is no longer simply an IT responsibility.
It has become a democratic necessity.
Governments continue debating regulation while offensive surveillance capabilities rapidly improve.
Meanwhile, zero-click exploits become more sophisticated, making user awareness alone insufficient.
Modern spyware increasingly defeats traditional antivirus software.
It hides within legitimate operating system processes.
It minimizes forensic traces.
It communicates through encrypted channels.
It often disappears after completing surveillance.
These characteristics dramatically complicate attribution.
Citizen Lab’s work remains among the world’s leading examples of independent digital forensic investigation.
Their methodology repeatedly uncovers surveillance operations that otherwise would remain invisible.
Without organizations performing independent technical verification, many victims would never discover their devices had been compromised.
Another critical lesson concerns institutional complacency.
Even after years of Pegasus headlines, practical defensive implementation appears inconsistent.
Regular forensic inspections should become routine for lawmakers, judges, investigative journalists, prosecutors, diplomats, and senior government officials.
Digital security should resemble public health.
Continuous monitoring is more effective than reacting after infection.
The spyware market itself also deserves closer scrutiny.
Private companies increasingly possess surveillance capabilities previously limited to intelligence agencies.
This creates difficult ethical questions regarding accountability, licensing, oversight, transparency, and international regulation.
Technology vendors often argue they merely sell tools.
History repeatedly shows that tools inevitably reflect the intentions of those deploying them.
If oversight remains weak, abuse becomes predictable rather than exceptional.
The Kouloglou incident illustrates precisely that risk.
The attack also exposes an intelligence paradox.
The more sensitive an investigation becomes, the more valuable investigators themselves become as surveillance targets.
Future parliamentary inquiries involving cybersecurity, defense, corruption, sanctions, or intelligence should expect similar attempts.
Cyber resilience must therefore become embedded into democratic governance rather than treated as optional technical support.
Ultimately, this story is not simply about Pegasus.
It is about trust.
Can democratic institutions protect confidential deliberations?
Can elected representatives communicate securely?
Can investigative committees operate free from hidden surveillance?
Until convincing answers emerge, public confidence will continue facing serious challenges.
✅ Citizen Lab publicly confirmed that Stelios Kouloglou’s phone was infected twice with Pegasus during his involvement with the European Parliament’s PEGA Committee.
✅ The reported infections occurred during key stages of committee hearings and report drafting, strengthening concerns that confidential parliamentary work may have been targeted.
✅ There is currently no publicly verified evidence identifying the party responsible for deploying Pegasus against Kouloglou, meaning attribution remains unresolved despite strong forensic confirmation of the infections.
Prediction
(+1) European institutions are likely to accelerate investment in mobile threat detection, parliamentary cybersecurity programs, and mandatory forensic screening for elected officials after this incident receives broader attention.
(-1) Commercial spyware will probably continue evolving faster than regulatory frameworks, allowing additional lawmakers, journalists, and investigators to become surveillance targets before comprehensive legal protections are implemented.
(-1) Unless international oversight becomes significantly stronger, the global mercenary spyware industry may remain one of the most difficult cybersecurity challenges facing democratic governments over the coming decade.
▶️ Related Video (76% Match):
🕵️📝Let’s dive deep and fact‑check.
🎓 Live Courses & Certifications:
Join Undercode Academy for Verified Certifications
🚀 Request a Custom Project:
Secure, high-velocity infrastructure and disruptive technological engineering. Contact our engineering team for high-tier development and proprietary systems:
[email protected]
💎 Smart Architecture | 🛡️ Secure by Design | ⭐ Trusted by Thousands
References:
Reported By: cyberscoop.com
Extra Source Hub (Possible Sources for article):
https://stackoverflow.com
Wikipedia
OpenAi & Undercode AI
Image Source:
Unsplash
Undercode AI DI v2
🔐JOIN OUR CYBER WORLD [ CVE News • HackMonitor • UndercodeNews ]
📢 Follow UndercodeNews & Stay Tuned:
𝕏 formerly Twitter 🐦 | @ Threads | 🔗 Linkedin | 🦋BlueSky | 🐘Mastodon | 📺Youtube
