Indian-Origin Tech CEO Claims He Was Shot At Twice in San Francisco: A Detailed Account

In the early hours of March 30, 2025, an unsettling incident unfolded in San Francisco involving Deep Prasad, the CEO of Quantum Generative Materials (GenMat), a company specializing in AI training datasets. According to a series of posts on the social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter), Prasad recounted the harrowing experience of being shot at twice near his hotel. The shocking details he shared raise serious concerns about both the nature of the attack and the local law enforcement’s response to the situation.

The Incident Unfolds

Around 3:30 to 4:00 a.m., Deep Prasad claims that he was pursued by assailant(s) who fired at him twice near his hotel. In his posts, Prasad describes the chilling moment when the shooter chased him to his hotel and fired a second shot as he ran inside. He immediately sought help from a hotel staff member, and the two of them heard the sound of gunfire.

“I’m still shaking,” Prasad wrote, detailing the traumatic encounter. He mentioned that both he and the hotel staff member were able to recognize the sound of the gunshot. The staff member reportedly recognized the weapon as a Glock, while Prasad only saw the impact of the bullet. The CEO went on to say that the experience was unnerving, and he felt the city had become dangerous, citing his 30 years of experience visiting or living in the area.

Discontent with the Police Response

Adding to the drama, Prasad expressed severe dissatisfaction with the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD). He was critical of their handling of the situation, accusing them of misclassifying the incident as a fireworks display rather than an attempted shooting. Prasad voiced his concerns on X, stating that the police had treated the case with “zero investigation,” which he believed was irresponsible and dangerous.

“The city is dangerous,” he said in a post. “I have never experienced this in 30 years.” This critique reflects growing frustration in the tech community over what some consider inadequate law enforcement responses to incidents in certain areas of San Francisco.

Possibility of Misidentification and Further Clarifications

Despite his strong stance, Prasad acknowledged that there could have been a misunderstanding about the nature of the incident. He entertained the possibility that the sounds they heard could have been fireworks, although he was adamant that the event was indeed a shooting. “I’m happy to be proven wrong,” Prasad said. “One interesting theory that was suggested to me was that they lobbed fireworks and we couldn’t see them. If that’s the case, a proper investigation will rule this out.”

However, he remained convinced that what he heard were shots from a pistol, specifically a Glock. He even mentioned the smell of gunpowder, further cementing his belief that this was no accidental explosion or fireworks display. In his final remarks, he made it clear that he refused to be “gaslit” into believing there were no guns involved.

What Undercode Say:

This unsettling account from a prominent tech CEO highlights several important issues. First and foremost, the lack of a proper police investigation in the wake of a potential shooting is a serious concern. As Prasad himself pointed out, misclassifying gunshots as fireworks could have far-reaching consequences, especially in a city where gun violence and public safety are increasingly under scrutiny. The incident raises questions about the readiness and responsiveness of local law enforcement, particularly given the high-profile nature of the victim.

The fact that a seasoned individual like Prasad could mistake gunshots for fireworks—despite having a long history of visits to the city—speaks volumes about the heightened anxiety and uncertainty that has taken root in certain neighborhoods. The tech community in San Francisco, which includes many influential figures, is undoubtedly concerned about the safety of their environment. Given that Prasad’s company is engaged in cutting-edge work on artificial intelligence, it is not surprising that his account has sparked wider discussions on safety in the city.

The tech world’s growing frustration with the local police force may indicate a bigger underlying issue: a systemic failure to address public safety in high-profile areas. While it is essential that an investigation be carried out to determine the truth behind this incident, it also points to an ongoing pattern of concerns among residents, visitors, and business owners in San Francisco.

In addition to the security concerns, this incident also raises important questions about accountability. Should law enforcement be expected to act more swiftly and decisively in the face of public safety threats, especially when the affected individuals are high-profile tech executives who often have global visibility? Could this case serve as a wake-up call for the city to take more aggressive steps in preventing violence?

Moreover, the incident brings to light the complex nature of public safety in urban areas. Prasad’s belief that the shots were from a Glock, combined with his detailed observations of the environment (e.g., the smell of gunpowder), only intensifies the need for an independent investigation into what transpired.

Fact Checker Results:

Deep Prasad’s claims of being shot at near his hotel on March 30, 2025, are yet to be corroborated by official law enforcement sources.
There has been no official statement from the San Francisco Police Department regarding the misclassification of the event as fireworks, as claimed by Prasad.
Additional investigation and forensic analysis will be needed to determine whether the sounds and impacts Prasad described were indeed caused by gunshots or fireworks.

References:

Reported By: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/they-chased-meim-still-shaking-indian-origin-tech-ceo-claims-he-was-shot-at-twice-in-us/articleshow/119756157.cms
Extra Source Hub:
https://www.linkedin.com
Wikipedia
Undercode AI